Walking in front of a Musalli – a person Performing Salah

8th June 2015

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: My query is regarding walking in front of someone performing Salāh. What is the minimum distance that needs to be left before you can cross in front of a person praying in the following context?

  1. In Jamāt (I assume the Imām holds the sajda point), so can someone walk between the safs(rows), whilst the Jamāt is in progress?
  2. When the Jāmat finishes, the latecomers who have joined the jamāt are still making up for their missed rakāts.  Can one move from their position if someone is still reading behind them?
  3. In small masjids where each row is filled, people often read their Sunahs/Nawafil Salāh in the same spot as there jamāt spot, which means each person is doing sajda almost at the heels of the person in front.  No sutra(barrier) stick is used, so should each and every person use  a sutra in this situation?  Some masjids have these but most don’t.
  4. What is the correct process that one should follow to exit the masjid whilst people are reading behind them?

 

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

Generally speaking, to walk in front of a person performing Salāh (Musalli) is prohibited (Karahat Tahreemi) and sinful. According to one Hadīth, it states that if one was to discover the severity in walking in front of a Mussali then he would stand to wait for forty years (if need be and dare not to walk in front). The minimum distance required for someone to be permitted to walk in front of the Musalli varies depending on where he is performing Salāh. In order to understand, some principles will be outlined to facilitate understanding of this matter.

The classical Hanafi jurists have outlined the following criteria for someone to walk across to be sinful;

  1. The Mussalli performs his Salāh either in a small room at home or in a small Masjid.[1] Scholars rule that distance is not considered therefore walking in front is not permissible at all.
  2. The Musalli performs his Salāh either in an open field or in a big Masjid. In this case, it is prohibited to walk across the Musalli within the distant range where the Musalli’s eyesight reaches when casting his gaze on to the sujūd point.[2] Contemporary scholars such as Shaykh Mufti Rasheed Ahmad Ludhyānwi v has preferred the view of two rows as the furthest distance one’s vision normally reaches.[3] Thus, it is not allowed to walk across the Musalli within the range of two rows and beyond that is permissible.

If the second point applies to you then the respective rulings are as follows;

  1. The Imām serves as a sutra (barrier) for the Musallis. Walking between the rows results in walking within the sujūd range and within the sutra Hence not permissible.
  2. If you are seated directly in front of the Masbooq [the one making up for the missed rak’at(s)] then you can move position as this does not constitute walking across the
  3. If you are directly positioned in front of the Musalli then similar ruling as point (2) applies. Otherwise use a sutra of the Masjid fulfils the criteria of a small Masjid mentioned above. A sutra can be anything that is an arm’s length and thick as a finger.[4] Even a chair, for instance, would suffice.
  4. If you are performing Salāh in a big Masjid then as mentioned you can walk in front the Musalli beyond two rows range otherwise place a sutra in front of the Musalli and walk across. If you cannot find a sutra then suggest one person stand in front of the Musalli as a point of sutra then walk across. After you have walked across then the second person can walk off.[5]

 

[Allãh Knows Best]

 

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

 

 

[1] A Masjid to be between 40-60 cubic length and width is considered to be small. Anything bigger is considered a big Masjid.

[2] Durrul Mukhtār wa hashiyah Ibn Ābideen Shāmi, Kitābus Salāh, Bāb mā yufsidu Salāt wa mā yukrahu fiha, vol 2 p. 398

(وَمُرُورُ مَارٍّ فِي الصَّحْرَاءِ أَوْ فِي مَسْجِدٍ كَبِيرٍ بِمَوْضِعِ سُجُودِهِ) فِي الْأَصَحِّ (أَوْ) مُرُورِهِ (بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ) إلَى حَائِطِ الْقِبْلَةِ (فِي) بَيْتٍ و (مَسْجِدٍ) صَغِيرٍ، فَإِنَّهُ كَبُقْعَةٍ وَاحِدَةٍ (مُطْلَقًا)

(قَوْلُهُ بِمَوْضِعِ سُجُودِهِ) أَيْ مِنْ مَوْضِعِ قَدَمِهِ إلَى مَوْضِعِ سُجُودِهِ كَمَا فِي الدُّرَرِ، وَهَذَا مَعَ الْقُيُودِ الَّتِي بَعْدَهُ إنَّمَا هُوَ لِلْإِثْمِ، وَإِلَّا فَالْفَسَادُ مُنْتَفٍ مُطْلَقًا (قَوْلُهُ فِي الْأَصَحِّ) هُوَ مَا اخْتَارَهُ شَمْسُ الْأَئِمَّةِ وَقَاضِي خَانَ وَصَاحِبُ الْهِدَايَةِ وَاسْتَحْسَنَهُ فِي الْمُحِيطِ وَصَحَّحَهُ الزَّيْلَعِيُّ، وَمُقَابِلُهُ مَا صَحَّحَهُ التُّمُرْتَاشِيُّ وَصَاحِبُ الْبَدَائِعِ وَاخْتَارَهُ فَخْرُ الْإِسْلَامِ وَرَجَّحَهُ فِي النِّهَايَةِ وَالْفَتْحِ أَنَّهُ قَدْرُ مَا يَقَعُ بَصَرُهُ عَلَى الْمَارِّ لَوْ صَلَّى بِخُشُوعٍ أَيْ رَامِيًا بِبَصَرِهِ إلَى مَوْضِعِ سُجُودِهِ؛ وَأَرْجِعُ فِي الْعِنَايَةِ الْأَوَّلِ إلَى الثَّانِي بِحَمْلِ مَوْضِعِ السُّجُودِ عَلَى الْقَرِيبِ مِنْهُ.

وَخَالَفَهُ فِي الْبَحْرِ وَصَحَّحَ الْأَوَّلَ، وَكَتَبْت فِيمَا عَلَّقْته عَلَيْهِ عَنْ التَّجْنِيسِ مَا يَدُلُّ عَلَى مَا فِي الْعِنَايَةِ فَرَاجِعْهُ (قَوْلُهُ إلَى حَائِطِ الْقِبْلَةِ) أَيْ مِنْ مَوْضِعِ قَدَمَيْهِ إلَى الْحَائِطِ إنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُ سُتْرَةٌ، فَلَوْ كَانَتْ لَا يَضُرُّ الْمُرُورُ وَرَاءَهَا عَلَى مَا يَأْتِي بَيَانُهُ (قَوْله فِي بَيْتٍ) ظَاهِرُهُ وَلَوْ كَبِيرًا. وَفِي الْقُهُسْتَانِيِّ: وَيَنْبَغِي أَنْ يَدْخُلَ فِيهِ أَيْ فِي حُكْمِ الْمَسْجِدِ الصَّغِيرِ الدَّارُ وَالْبَيْتُ (قَوْلُهُ وَمَسْجِدِ صَغِيرٍ) هُوَ أَقَلُّ مِنْ سِتِّينَ ذِرَاعًا، وَقِيلَ مِنْ أَرْبَعِينَ، وَهُوَ الْمُخْتَارُ كَمَا أَشَارَ إلَيْهِ فِي الْجَوَاهِرِ قُهُسْتَانِيٌّ

 

[3] Ahsanul Fatāwa vol 3 p. 409

[4] Durrul Mukhtār, Kitābus Salāh, Bāb mā yufsidu Salāt wa mā yukrahu fiha vol 2 p. 401

(سُتْرَةً بِقَدْرِ ذِرَاعٍ) طُولًا (وَغِلَظِ أُصْبُعٍ) لِتَبْدُوَ لِلنَّاظِرِ (بِقُرْبِهِ) دُونَ ثَلَاثَةِ أَذْرُعٍ (عَلَى) حِذَاءٍ (أَحَدِ حَاجِبَيْهِ) مَا بَيْنَ عَيْنَيْهِ وَالْأَيْمَنُ أَفْضَلُ

[5] Durrul Mukhtār wa hashiyah Ibn Ābideen Shāmi, Kitābus Salāh, Bāb mā yufsidu Salāt wa mā yukrahu fiha vol 2 p. 401

وَلَوْ مَرَّ اثْنَانِ يَقُومُ أَحَدُهُمَا أَمَامَهُ وَيَمُرُّ الْآخَرُ وَيَفْعَلُ الْآخَرُ هَكَذَا يَمُرَّانِ

Using Stoma Bag and Purity

29th May 2015                                                                       

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: My question is regarding people who use a stoma bag due to which their excretion is collected in an external bag that is attached to them. They have no control over their excretion as to when it comes out. Many times it is not even known that something has come out. The actual bag is very durable not emitting any smell and there’s a very low chance of it ripping. Usually, it has a small vent which lets out the air/gas from the bag. The vent lets out a minimal amount of air/gas which is not felt nor smelt. Some people have a permanent stoma and others have a temporary one (it can be reversed by operation) my question is;

  1. Would this person be classed as an excused person (ma’zur) or would he treat the bag like an internal organ?
  2. Is this person allowed in the masjid?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

  1. In principle, the stoma bag will be treated as something external to the body like any other bag attached to the body wherein stool is collected. This is based on it being detachable from the body requiring no surgical operation. You stated that a person with a stoma bag has no control over his excretion, suggesting that it proves difficult to know when one’s excrement passes into the bag. If it is continuous, allowing very little time for wudhu and Salāh [even the Fardh only] then the laws of Ma’zoor can be considered otherwise not. For the purpose of clarity, a Shar’ee Ma’zoor (genuinely excused) is that individual who suffers from the continuous discharge of stool, urine, blood or any other breakers of wudhu. The condition is that the continuous discharge during the first time around must encompass an entire Fardh Salāh time, not allowing sufficient time to perform wudhu and Salāh. If this happens, then one qualifies as a Ma’zoor. One remains a Ma’zoor even if the discharge occurs only once in every subsequent Fardh Salāh time and not continuous as formerly as long as it transpires from the same illness.[1] A Ma’zoor person must perform wudhu once before every Fardh Salāh time. During then he can perform as many Salāhs as he wishes with this same wudhu until its end time provided that no other factors breaching the wudhu occurs. The wudhu remains intact and then automatically breaks upon the expiry of every Fardh Salāh time due to the discharge, which by then wudhu must be renewed for the next Salāh.[2] Once this is clear then you must assess whether this is the case with yourself and if so then the laws of Ma’zoor would apply to you otherwise not. Your overwhelming conjecture (ghalib Zann) on this matter is sufficient to determine your condition. Another Mas’alah that affects your condition is the issue of carrying Najasat during Salāh. The Hanafi Fuqaha (jurists) have rendered the Salāh invalid if a person carries impurity (because it being similar to clothes stained with Najis) whilst performing Salāh, provided it is bigger than the quantity of a Dirham (e.g. £2 coin or so).[3] In your case, however, if the continuous excretion doesn’t allow you sufficient time to empty the excrement or replace the bag before making wudhu and perform Salāh then you can perform your Salāh in this state and empty the bag when necessary otherwise, the excretion collected must be removed before reading Salāh.[4] It must be made clear that a Ma’zoor person cannot lead others in prayer due to his illness.
  2. Yes, it is permissible to enter the Masjid. However, care must be taken that the Masjid is not soiled such as unnoticed leakage.

  

[Allãh Knows Best]

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

[1] Durrul Mukhtar Kitabut Tahārat, matlab fi Ahkāmil Ma’zoor, p.45

(وَصَاحِبُ عُذْرٍ مَنْ بِهِ سَلَسٌ) بَوْلٍ لَا يُمْكِنُهُ إمْسَاكُهُ (أَوْ اسْتِطْلَاقُ بَطْنٍ أَوْ انْفِلَاتُ رِيحٍ أَوْ اسْتِحَاضَةٌ) أَوْ بِعَيْنِهِ رَمَدٌ أَوْ عَمَشٌ أَوْ غَرَبٌ، وَكَذَا كُلُّ مَا يَخْرُجُ بِوَجَعٍ وَلَوْ مِنْ أُذُنٍ وَثَدْيٍ وَسُرَّةٍ (إنْ اسْتَوْعَبَ عُذْرُهُ تَمَامَ وَقْتِ صَلَاةٍ مَفْرُوضَةٍ) بِأَنْ لَا يَجِدَ فِي جَمِيعِ وَقْتِهَا زَمَنًا يَتَوَضَّأُ وَيُصَلِّي فِيهِ خَالِيًا عَنْ الْحَدَثِ (وَلَوْ حُكْمًا) لِأَنَّ الِانْقِطَاعَ الْيَسِيرَ مُلْحَقٌ بِالْعَدَمِ (وَهَذَا شَرْطُ) الْعُذْرِ (فِي حَقِّ الِابْتِدَاءِ، وَفِي) حَقِّ (الْبَقَاءِ كَفَى وُجُودُهُ فِي جُزْءٍ مِنْ الْوَقْتِ) وَلَوْ مَرَّةً (وَفِي) حَقِّ الزَّوَالِ يُشْتَرَطُ (اسْتِيعَابُ الِانْقِطَاعِ) تَمَامَ الْوَقْتِ (حَقِيقَةً) لِأَنَّهُ الِانْقِطَاعُ الْكَامِلُ

[2] Ibid

(وَحُكْمُهُ الْوُضُوءُ) لَا غَسْلُ ثَوْبِهِ وَنَحْوِهِ (لِكُلِّ فَرْضٍ) اللَّامُ لِلْوَقْتِ كَمَا فِي – {لِدُلُوكِ الشَّمْسِ} [الإسراء: 78]- (ثُمَّ يُصَلِّي) بِهِ (فِيهِ فَرْضًا وَنَفْلًا) فَدَخَلَ الْوَاجِبُ بِالْأَوْلَى (فَإِذَا خَرَجَ الْوَقْتُ بَطَلَ) أَيْ: ظَهَرَ حَدَثُهُ السَّابِقُ

[3] Durrul Mukhtaar & Ibn Abideen ash-Shaami Book of Salāh, baab Shuroot as-Salāh,p.73-74 vol 2

(وَخَبَثٍ) مَانِعٍ كَذَلِكَ (وَثَوْبِهِ) وَكَذَا مَا يَتَحَرَّك بِحَرَكَتِهِ أَوْ يُعَدُّ حَامِلًا لَهُ

(قَوْلُهُ وَكَذَا مَا) أَيْ شَيْءٌ مُتَّصِلٌ بِهِ يَتَحَرَّكُ بِحَرَكَتِهِ كَمِنْدِيلٍ طَرَفُهُ عَلَى عُنُقِهِ وَفِي الْآخَرِ نَجَاسَةٌ مَانِعَةٌ إنْ تَحَرَّكَ مَوْضِعُ النَّجَاسَةِ بِحَرَكَاتِ الصَّلَاةِ مَنَعَ وَإِلَّا لَا

[4] Durrul Mukhtaar p. 506 vol 1

(وَإِنْ سَالَ عَلَى ثَوْبِهِ) فَوْقَ الدِّرْهَمِ (جَازَ لَهُ أَنْ لَا يَغْسِلَهُ إنْ كَانَ لَوْ غَسَلَهُ تَنَجَّسَ قَبْلَ الْفَرَاغِ مِنْهَا) أَيْ: الصَّلَاةِ (وَإِلَّا) يَتَنَجَّسْ قَبْلَ فَرَاغِهِ (فَلَا) يَجُوزُ تَرْكُ غَسْلِهِ، هُوَ الْمُخْتَارُ لِلْفَتْوَى

Repeating the Congregational Salāh

18th May 2015

 

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: If a group of brothers arrive late to the Masjid and as a result missed the Jamā’at, is it permissible for them to perform their own Salāh in congregation in the same prayer hall or is it Makrooh?

 

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

The above issue relates to the case of takrārul Jamā’at (repetition of the congregational prayer). The Hanafi jurists have outlined four conditions for the repeated congregational Salāh becoming Makrooh Tahreemi. They are as follows,

  1. Performed in a local Masjid with a fixed Imām and a Muadhin. It is not read in a public road Masjid where there is no fixed Imām or Muadhin or a service station.
  2. The first Jamā’at was performed with Adhān and Iqāmah.
  3. The repeated Jamā’at is performed in the same area (in the prayer hall near to the Mihrāb) as the first one. If performed anywhere other than the prayer hall or away from the Mihrāb then not Makrooh.[1]

If none of the above conditions is fulfilled then the repeated Jamā’at does not become Makrooh. One must not exploit the above ruling by habitually arriving late to the Masjid as this in itself is Makrooh. Every effort should be made to arrive promptly to the first congregational Salāh.

 

[Allãh Knows Best]

 

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

 

[1] Durrul Mukhtār wa hashiyah Ibn Ābideen Shāmi, Kitābus Salāh, Bābul Imāmat p. 288-289 vol 2

وَيُكْرَهُ تَكْرَارُ الْجَمَاعَةِ بِأَذَانٍ وَإِقَامَةٍ فِي مَسْجِدِ مَحَلَّةٍ لَا فِي مَسْجِدِ طَرِيقٍ أَوْ مَسْجِدٍ لَا إمَامَ لَهُ وَلَا مُؤَذِّنَ –

وَلَوْ كَرَّرَ أَهْلُهُ بِدُونِهِمَا أَوْ كَانَ مَسْجِدَ طَرِيقٍ جَازَ إجْمَاعًا؛ كَمَا فِي مَسْجِدٍ لَيْسَ لَهُ إمَامٌ وَلَا مُؤَذِّنٌ وَيُصَلِّي النَّاسُ فِيهِ فَوْجًا فَوْجًا، فَإِنَّ الْأَفْضَلَ أَنْ يُصَلِّيَ كُلُّ فَرِيقٍ بِأَذَانٍ وَإِقَامَةٍ عَلَى حِدَةٍ كَمَا فِي أَمَالِي قَاضِي خَانْ اهـ وَنَحْوُهُ فِي الدُّرَرِ، وَالْمُرَادُ بِمَسْجِدِ الْمَحَلَّةِ مَا لَهُ إمَامٌ وَجَمَاعَةٌ مَعْلُومُونَ كَمَا فِي الدُّرَرِ وَغَيْرِهَا. قَالَ فِي الْمَنْبَعِ: وَالتَّقْيِيدُ بِالْمَسْجِدِ الْمُخْتَصِّ بِالْمَحَلَّةِ احْتِرَازٌ مِنْ الشَّارِعِ- وَبِالْأَذَانِ الثَّانِي احْتِرَازًا عَمَّا إذَا صَلَّى فِي مَسْجِدِ الْمَحَلَّةِ جَمَاعَةٌ بِغَيْرِ أَذَانٍ حَيْثُ يُبَاحُ إجْمَاعًا- عَنْ أَبِي يُوسُفَ أَنَّهُ إذَا لَمْ تَكُنْ الْجَمَاعَةُ عَلَى الْهَيْئَةِ الْأُولَى لَا تُكْرَهُ وَإِلَّا تُكْرَهُ، وَهُوَ الصَّحِيحُ، وَبِالْعُدُولِ عَنْ الْمِحْرَابِ تَخْتَلِفُ الْهَيْئَةُ كَذَا فِي الْبَزَّازِيَّةِ انْتَهَى. وَفِي التَّتَارْخَانِيَّة عَنْ الْوَلْوَالِجيَّةِ: وَبِهِ نَأْخُذُ

 

Fasting Whilst Breathing in Steam

13th May 2015

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: If a person breathes in steam does that invalidate the fast?

 

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

In reference to your first query, breathing in steam in a place where it is generally avoidable for instance, placing a towel over the head and breathing vaporized steam from a hot bucket of water invalidates the fast. Otherwise, occasions, where it is generally unavoidable e.g. when taking a shower and steam travels up the nose into the body, then this does not invalidate the fast.[1]

The general principle to remember is that being in a condition or place where the intention is to inhale steam (or smoke) that is easily avoidable will invalidate the fast. If this is not the case, that the intention is not to breath and the steam involuntarily passes through the tract of the nose then the fast does not break.

 

[Allāh Knows Best]

 

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

 

 

[1] Durrul Mukhtar

(أَوْ دَخَلَ حَلْقَهُ غُبَارٌ أَوْ ذُبَابٌ أَوْ دُخَانٌ) وَلَوْ ذَاكِرًا اسْتِحْسَانًا لِعَدَمِ إمْكَانِ التَّحَرُّزِ عَنْهُ، وَمُفَادُهُ أَنَّهُ لَوْ أَدْخَلَ حَلْقَهُ الدُّخَانَ أَفْطَرَ أَيَّ دُخَانٍ كَانَ وَلَوْ عُودًا أَوْ عَنْبَرًا لَهُ ذَاكِرًا لِإِمْكَانِ التَّحَرُّزِ عَنْهُ

Ibn Abideen As-Shaami, p.366 vol 3

(قَوْلُهُ: لِعَدَمِ إمْكَانِ التَّحَرُّزِ عَنْهُ) فَأَشْبَهَ الْغُبَارَ وَالدُّخَانَ لِدُخُولِهِمَا مِنْ الْأَنْفِ إذَا أَطْبَقَ الْفَمَ كَمَا فِي الْفَتْحِ، وَهَذَا يُفِيدُ أَنَّهُ إذَا وَجَدَ بُدًّا مِنْ تَعَاطِي مَا يُدْخِلُ غُبَارَهُ فِي حَلْقِهِ أَفْسَدَ لَوْ فَعَلَ شُرُنْبُلَالِيَّةٌ (قَوْلُهُ: وَمُفَادُهُ) أَيْ مُفَادُ قَوْلِهِ دَخَلَ أَيْ بِنَفْسِهِ بِلَا صُنْعٍ مِنْهُ (قَوْلُهُ: أَنَّهُ لَوْ أَدْخَلَ حَلْقَهُ الدُّخَانَ) أَيْ بِأَيِّ صُورَةٍ كَانَ الْإِدْخَالُ، حَتَّى لَوْ تَبَخَّرَ بِبَخُورٍ وَآوَاهُ إلَى نَفَسِهِ وَاشْتَمَّهُ ذَاكِرًا لِصَوْمِهِ أَفْطَرَ لِإِمْكَانِ التَّحَرُّزِ عَنْهُ

الفتاوی الہندیۃ، کتاب الصوم، فِيمَا يُفْسِدُ وَمَا لَا يُفْسِدُ، جلد ۱، ص۲۰۳

وَلَوْ دَخَلَ حَلْقَهُ غُبَارُ الطَّاحُونَةِ أَوْ طَعْمُ الْأَدْوِيَةِ أَوْ غُبَارُ الْهَرْسِ، وَأَشْبَاهُهُ أَوْ الدُّخَانُ أَوْ مَا سَطَعَ مِنْ غُبَارِ التُّرَابِ بِالرِّيحِ أَوْ بِحَوَافِرِ الدَّوَابِّ، وَأَشْبَاهِ ذَلِكَ لَمْ يُفْطِرْهُ كَذَا فِي السِّرَاجِ الْوَهَّاجِ.

 

Breaking Fast when Travelling

13th May 2015

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question. The Holy Qur’ān gives the concession for a traveler not to fast during Ramadhān. Does this apply to a fasting person who initiates his journey after Subhu Sādiq and during his journey breaks his Fast deliberately? Would such an individual become sinful or not? In addition to Qadhā, is Kaffarah necessary?

 

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

According to the Hanafi School, the concession for a Musāfir (traveler) not to fast applies only if the person in question was became a Musāfir at Subhu Sādiq (the beginning time of Fajr when fast begins) time.  In the aforementioned case, the fasting person was a Muqeem (resident) during Subhu Sādiq, thus was not permitted to break the fast without a valid reason. If he ended up breaking his fast deliberately however after initiating the journey during the day (i.e. after Subhu Sadiq) then only Qadhā is necessary and not Kaffarah. If he decided to intentionally break his fast at home before starting his journey then both Qadhā and Kaffarah become necessary.[1]

 

 

 [Allāh Knows Best]

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

 

[1] Fatawa Hindiyyah, Kitabus Sawm, p.227, vol 1

(الْبَابُ الْخَامِسُ فِي الْأَعْذَارِ الَّتِي تُبِيحُ الْإِفْطَارَ) . (مِنْهَا السَّفَرُ) الَّذِي يُبِيحُ الْفِطْرَ وَهُوَ لَيْسَ بِعُذْرٍ فِي الْيَوْمِ الَّذِي أَنْشَأَ السَّفَرَ فِيهِ كَذَا فِي الْغِيَاثِيَّةِ. فَلَوْ سَافَرَ نَهَارًا لَا يُبَاحُ لَهُ الْفِطْرُ فِي ذَلِكَ الْيَوْمِ، وَإِنْ أَفْطَرَ لَا كَفَّارَةَ عَلَيْهِ بِخِلَافِ مَا لَوْ أَفْطَرَ ثُمَّ سَافَرَ كَذَا فِي مُحِيطِ السَّرَخْسِيِّ

Hijamah (Cupping) Insurance

30th April 2015

 

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: Is it permissible to have public liability insurance when doing Hijamah (cupping) on others? This is in case if someone makes a wrongful claim against you.

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

In reference to your query, all forms of insurance schemes fall under the scheme of qimar (gambling) which is categorically forbidden in the Qur’an and the Sunnah. However, only those types of insurances are permitted which are either required by law or there is a genuine necessity depending on the circumstances, for instance car insurance and those similar to it. Such insurances have been Islamically permitted due to the rule of dharoorat and Hajat (extreme necessity – fulfilling their respective conditions).

As far as complementary therapy, such as cupping, insurance for public liability is concerned, firstly this is not a legal requirement by law but only in case if a patient wants to take legal action against the therapist. Secondly, therapist experts generally consider cupping as a safe treatment, when done properly that is so to cleanse and enhance the blood circulation. So long as the therapist knows what he is doing, the chances of the patient’s health falling at risk is very slim. Thus, insurance cannot be considered as a general necessity (dharorat or Hajat) in this case.

In conclusion, there is no Islamic legitimacy in applying for public liability insurance for cupping therapy due to the fact that it is part of Qimar scheme and not considered a genuine necessity, hence must be avoided.

 [Allãh Knows Best]

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

Reviling against Abu Bakar

20th April 2015

Question:

What is the ruling regarding an individual who believes that Sayyidunā Abu Bakr radhiyallahu anhu (God forbid) became an apostate after the demise of the Holy Prophet sallallahu alayhi wasallam does Such a person remain a Muslim?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

To accuse Sayyiduna Abu Bakr As-Sideeq radhiyallahu anhu of apostasy after the demise of the Holy Prophet sallallahu alayhi wasallam is a clear infringement of the fundamentals of the Islamic creed. When the Noble Qur’an refers to him as the Prophet’s companion (during the incident of the cave) then accusing him of apostasy is a clear rejection of the verse. This is a clear rejection of his status of sahabiyyat which is tantamount to disbelief.[1] He, therefore, falls outside the fold of Islām and must renew his faith and make sincere tawbah.  

[Allāh Knows Best]


[1] Imām Razi, Mafateehul Ghaib, vol 16, p. 51 commentary of the verse [9:40)

وَالْوَجْهُ السَّادِسُ: أَنَّهُ تَعَالَى وَصَفَ أَبَا بَكْرٍ بِكَوْنِهِ صَاحِبًا لِلرَّسُولِ وَذَلِكَ يَدُلُّ عَلَى كَمَالِ الْفَضْلِ. قَالَ الْحُسَيْنُ بْنُ فُضَيْلٍ الْبَجَلِيُّ: مَنْ أَنْكَرَ أَنْ يَكُونَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ صَاحِبَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ كَافِرًا، لِأَنَّ الْأُمَّةَ مُجْمِعَةٌ عَلَى أَنَّ الْمُرَادَ مِنْ إِذْ يَقُولُ لِصاحِبِهِ هُوَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ، وَذَلِكَ يَدُلُّ عَلَى أَنَّ اللَّهَ تَعَالَى وَصَفَهُ بِكَوْنِهِ صَاحِبًا لَهُ

 

Dry Cleaners

23rd March 2015

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question:  Does dry cleaning procedure purify impure stains on the clothes?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

In reference to your query, dry cleaning is a process of cleaning clothes through the use of chemical detergents known as solvents before drying. In dry cleaning, giving the apparent impression of no usage of any liquid, clothes are actually washed in solvent liquid before being jet steamed or pressed with an iron. The dry cleaning method is used to clean delicate fabrics clothes that are unable to withstand normal washing machines that could potentially damage the clothes. The procedure is that dry cleaners place the clothes into a huge rotating dry cleaning drum (similar but bigger than the standard washing machine). Solvent chemicals are then added in which the clothes are washed to a certain temperature. During the process, the solvent passes through a filtering tank and then poured back into the drum for distillation to remove any impurities on the clothes. After the washing cycle, the clothes are then dried in the same chamber before they are taken out and thereafter, steamed and pressed. The solvent is recycled and refined before every wash of new batch of clothes.

From the Islamic viewpoint, to use anything that is pure and has the capacity to remove impurity from the clothes whether it is water or any other liquid substance is permissible. The jurists state a person’s clothes becomes pure if he uses vinegar to remove an impure stain because it is a detergent substance.[1] The similar case can be applied to the solvent chemicals used in dry cleaning also in that, the clothes become pure if the effect of the impure stain, i.e. colour or smell, don’t remain on to the clothes.                

 [Allãh Knows Best]

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

[1] Haskafi, Durrul Mukhtar Kitabut Taharat, Babul Anjas p. 46

يَجُوزُ رَفْعُ نَجَاسَةٍ حَقِيقِيَّةٍ عَنْ مَحَلِّهَا) وَلَوْ إنَاءً أَوْ مَأْكُولًا عُلِمَ مَحَلُّهَا أَوْ لَا (بِمَاءٍ لَوْ مُسْتَعْمَلًا) بِهِ يُفْتَى (وَبِكُلِّ مَائِعٍ طَاهِرٍ قَالِعٍ) لِلنَّجَاسَةِ يَنْعَصِرُ بِالْعَصْرِ (كَخَلٍّ وَمَاءِ وَرْدٍ) حَتَّى الرِّيقُ

Ibn Nujaym, Bahr Raiq Kitabut Taharat, Babul Anjas, vol 1, p.384

(قَوْلُهُ: وَبِمَائِعٍ مُزِيلٍ كَالْخَلِّ وَمَاءِ الْوَرْدِ) قِيَاسًا عَلَى إزَالَتِهَا بِالْمَاءِ بِنَاءً عَلَى أَنَّ الطَّهَارَةَ بِالْمَاءِ مَعْلُولَةٌ بِعِلَّةِ كَوْنِهِ قَالِعًا لِتِلْكَ النَّجَاسَةِ وَالْمَائِعُ قَالِعٌ فَهُوَ مُحَصِّلُ ذَلِكَ الْمَقْصُودِ فَتَحْصُلُ بِهِ الطَّهَارَةُ

Estate Distribution Between Two Wives, Six Sons and Five Daughters

17th March 2015

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: My father died leaving behind two wives and 6 sons and 5 daughters. Kindly inform us how his estate will be distributed Islamically.

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

In view of the existing members you mentioned, the estate will be distributed according to the below Islamic guidelines after fulfilling of all funeral expenses, clearing all outstanding debts and executing one-third of the deceased’s wealth (in the case he made one). Note that the wife’s share will be allocated first and the residue will be distributed between his children. View the table below

 

Beneficiaries Share
Wife 1 1/8th (divided between both wives equally)
Wife 2
   
Children 17 Shares
Son 1 2
Son 2 2
Son 3 2
Son 4 2
Son 5 2
Son 6 2
Daughter 1 1
Daughter 2 1
Daughter 3 1
Daughter 4 1
Daughter 5 1

 

After subtracting 1/8th of the total estate for the wives, the residue amount will be divided by 17 shares for the children; each son inheriting double the share of a daughter, so to give you each person’s Shar’ee entitlement in cash.

 

[Allãh Knows Best]

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

Disciplining Children For Neglecting Salāh

Disciplining Children For Neglecting Salāh

10th March 2015

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: Is it permissible to discipline a child below or after the age of seven through hitting if they refuse to pray Salāh?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

It must be made clear that Islām is a religion of mercy and compassion and abhors physical abuse towards children. It however allows reasonable disciplining of children for open disobedience and neglecting an obligatory act when they reach to a certain age. The famous Hadeeth in which the Messenger of Allāh sallallahu alayhi wasallam said, “Instruct your children to perform Salāh when they reach seven years of age and discipline them at the age of ten if they refuse,” does not allow hitting the child at the age of seven but apparently suggests hitting at the age of ten and above for refusing to pray Salāh. At this age, children begin maturing in their understanding of what’s right and wrong as opposed to when they are seven years of age. So him refusing to pray Salāh is tantamount to rebelling against Allāh’s Divine command which is a major sin in itself. This often happens when the importance of Salāh is not embedded in them at an early age nor parents themselves punctually pray Salāh themselves. Based on the hadeeth though, hitting children below the age of ten for not praying Salāh is not permitted.

It must be remembered that hitting was prescribed merely as a deterrent due to its effectiveness at the time otherwise any kind of discipline that proves effective without resorting to hitting is permissible. The Hadeeth should therefore not be adopted in its literal sense. Resorting to hitting instantly is not the solution in this day and age and best avoided as much as possible. Caution is necessary when disciplining so not to create deep resentment in the child. Children should be taught with compassion and love the rules and method of Salāh in the primary years so to reduce the chances of such disciplinary measures.

[Allãh Knows Best]

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department