A Divorced Woman Working or Studying during her Grace Period

A Divorced Woman Working or Studying during her Grace Period

20th August 2016

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: Is it permissible for a divorced woman to continue working during her waiting period? They separated on the basis that the husband never provided nafaqah (maintenance) for her nor contributed to the home utility expenditure. The wife was compelled to find a job to pay for the household expenditure and bring food to the table. If she does not work during her waiting period, she will end up losing her job. So can she work during her waiting period?

In addition, would the similar ruling apply to a woman who is studying the Ālim course at her local institute? Can she attend her regular classes during her waiting period or not?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

The general Islamic position is that a female divorcee cannot emerge from her home during her waiting period due to the explicit Qur’anic command on this matter except during to extreme necessity that involves physical and monetary harm. It is the husband’s moral duty to provide for her daily expenses during that time and failing to do so will be a sin on his part. However, if it is the case where the wife is compelled to work because her husband refuses to provide for her and nobody is willing to financially support her then as a last resort, the jurists such as Ibn Nujaim rahimahullah have permitted such divorcee to emerge to earn her livelihood during her waiting period as a necessity.[1] It must be made clear here that concessions are limited to the extent necessary, and where the necessity is removed then so is the concession. Due to the necessary case, this rule of concession is restricted only to work and cannot be extended to other areas where physical or monetary harm is not incurred. So reasons such as studying, visiting family relatives and so on are not legitimate reasons for her to leave her home during her Iddah.

[Allãh Knows Best]

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

[1] Ibn Nujaim, Bahr Raiq, Kitābut Talāq -Fasl Fil Ihdād, vol 6 p. 259

وَالْحَاصِلُ أَنَّ مَدَارَ الْحِلِّ كَوْنُ خُرُوجِهَا بِسَبَبِ قِيَامِ شُغْلِ الْمَعِيشَةِ فَيَتَقَدَّرُ بِقَدْرِهِ فَمَتَى انْقَضَتْ حَاجَتُهَا لَا يَحِلُّ لَهَا بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ صَرْفُ الزَّمَانِ خَارِجَ بَيْتِهَا كَذَا فِي فَتْحِ الْقَدِيرِ وَأَقُولُ: لَوْ صَحَّ هَذَا عَمَّمَ أَصْحَابُنَا الْحُكْمَ فَقَالُوا لَا تَخْرُجُ الْمُعْتَدَّةُ عَنْ طَلَاقٍ أَوْ مَوْتٍ إلَّا لِضَرُورَةٍ؛ لِأَنَّ الْمُطَلَّقَةَ تَخْرُجُ لِلضَّرُورَةِ بِحَسْبِهَا لَيْلًا كَانَ أَوْ نَهَارًا وَالْمُعْتَدَّةُ عَنْ مَوْتٍ كَذَلِكَ فَأَيْنَ الْفَرْقُ؟

Durrul Mukhtār wa hashiyah Ibn Ābideen Shāmi, Kitāb Talāb, Fasl Fil Ihdād, vol 5 p. 223

قَالَ فِي الْفَتْحِ: وَالْحَقُّ أَنَّ عَلَى الْمُفْتِي أَنْ يَنْظُرَ فِي خُصُوصِ الْوَقَائِعِ، فَإِنْ عَلِمَ فِي وَاقِعَةٍ عَجْزَ هَذِهِ الْمُخْتَلِعَةِ عَنْ الْمَعِيشَةِ إنْ لَمْ تَخْرُجْ أَفْتَاهَا بِالْحِلِّ، وَإِنْ عَلِمَ قُدْرَتَهَا أَفْتَاهَا بِالْحُرْمَةِ اهـ وَأَقَرَّهُ فِي النَّهْرِ والشُّرُنبُلالِيَّة.

The Islamic Ruling on Tending to the Cleanliness of Old People in Care Homes

16th August 2016

 

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: What is the Islamic ruling regarding a person working in care home looking after the old which also requires cleaning their privates? Is it permissible or does one need to look for an alternative job?  

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

 

Answer

From the Islamic legal perspective, the person in question is not required to look for an alternative job. Working in care homes in looking after the old and sick people is a rewardable act in Islām. The question of cleaning their private area during their care is inevitable. As this is part of the job when working in care homes, it would be permissible as a necessity based on the rule that necessity permit prohibited acts.[1] The jurists have permitted a doctor to view the private area of a man or woman during surgical operation as a necessity. This is also applicable to cleaning the private area in the sense that both cases require tending to remove unwanted substance or harm, namely filth in this case which is a fundamental requirement in Islām for ones Ibādāt (worships) to be accepted. Islam allows exposure of the private area for this reason otherwise in normal circumstances it disallows it. As the rule of necessity applies, the following conditions must be met;[2]

  1. Only that area should be exposed which is necessary. Seeing or exposing anything beyond the required area is not allowed because necessity is restricted only to its required perimeter.
  2. Carers of the same gender as the patient should clean the private area. In other words, female carers should clean female patients and male patients should tend to male patients. This is because in the case of necessity, exposure of the private area to the same gender is considered a lesser degree harm than that of the opposite gender. Should this be near impossible for instance, carers are not allocated to one specific patient and due to the nature of the job, the time schedule varies as carers are rotated between different patients then as a last resort the carer can clean the private area of the opposite gender. But caution must be taken that carers do not look at the private parts of the patients unnecessarily. This also goes for female carer cleaning male patient also.

 

 

[Allãh Knows Best]

 

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

 

[1] Kasāni, Badā’i Sanā’i, Kitābul Istihsān, vol 6, p. 499

لِأَنَّ الْحُرُمَاتِ الشَّرْعِيَّةَ جَازَ أَنْ يَسْقُطَ اعْتِبَارُهَا شَرْعًا لِمَكَانِ الضَّرُورَةِ كَحُرْمَةِ الْمَيِّتَةِ وَشُرْبِ الْخَمْرِ حَالَةَ الْمَخْمَصَةِ وَالْإِكْرَاهِ لَكِنَّ الثَّابِتَ بِالضَّرُورَةِ لَا يَعْدُو مَوْضِعَ الضَّرُورَةِ لِأَنَّ عِلَّةَ ثُبُوتِهَا الضَّرُورَةُ وَالْحُكْمُ لَا يَزِيدُ عَلَى قَدْرِ الْعِلَّةِ هَذَا الَّذِي ذَكَرْنَا حُكْمُ النَّظَرِ وَالْمَسِّ

 

[2] Durrul Mukhtār wa Ibn Ābideen as-Shāmi, Kitābul Al-Hazr wal Ibāhat-Fasl Fin Nazr wal Lums, vol 9 p. 532-3

وَشِرَائِهَا وَمُدَاوَاتِهَا يَنْظُرُ) الطَّبِيبُ (إلَى مَوْضِعِ مَرَضِهَا بِقَدْرِ الضَّرُورَةِ) إذْ الضَّرُورَاتُ تَتَقَدَّرُ بِقَدْرِهَا)

وَقَالَ فِي الْجَوْهَرَةِ: إذَا كَانَ الْمَرَضُ فِي سَائِرِ بَدَنِهَا غَيْرَ الْفَرْجِ يَجُوزُ النَّظَرُ إلَيْهِ عِنْدَ الدَّوَاءِ، لِأَنَّهُ مَوْضِعُ ضَرُورَةٍ، وَإِنْ كَانَ فِي مَوْضِعِ الْفَرْجِ، فَيَنْبَغِي أَنْ يُعَلِّمَ امْرَأَةً تُدَاوِيهَا فَإِنْ لَمْ تُوجَدْ وَخَافُوا عَلَيْهَا أَنْ تَهْلِكَ أَوْ يُصِيبَهَا وَجَعٌ لَا تَحْتَمِلُهُ يَسْتُرُوا مِنْهَا كُلَّ شَيْءٍ إلَّا مَوْضِعَ الْعِلَّةِ ثُمَّ يُدَاوِيهَا الرَّجُلُ وَيَغُضُّ بَصَرَهُ مَا اسْتَطَاعَ إلَّا عَنْ مَوْضِعِ الْجُرْحِ

 

Ibn Nujaim, Bahr Raiq, Kitābul Karahiyyah-Fasl Fin Nazr wal Lums, vol 8 p. 353

وَالطَّبِيبُ إنَّمَا يَجُوزُ لَهُ ذَلِكَ إذَا لَمْ يُوجَدْ امْرَأَةٌ طَبِيبَةٌ فَلَوْ وُجِدَتْ فَلَا يَجُوزُ لَهُ أَنْ يَنْظُرَ لِأَنَّ نَظَرَ الْجِنْسِ إلَى الْجِنْسِ أَخَفُّ وَيَنْبَغِي لِلطَّبِيبِ أَنْ يُعَلِّمَ امْرَأَةً إنْ أَمْكَنَ وَإِنْ لَمْ يُمْكِنْ سَتَرَ كُلَّ عُضْوٍ مِنْهَا سِوَى مَوْضِعِ الْوَجَعِ ثُمَّ يَنْظُرُ وَيَغُضُّ بِبَصَرِهِ عَنْ غَيْرِ ذَلِكَ الْمَوْضِعِ إنْ اسْتَطَاعَ لِأَنَّ مَا ثَبَتَ لِلضَّرُورَةِ يَتَقَدَّرُ بِقَدْرِهَا

 

The Holy Prophet’s sallallahu alayhi wasallam Marriage in Paradise

The Holy Prophet’s sallallahu alayhi wasallam Marriage in Paradise

12th August 2016

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: Is it true that Sayyidah Maryam radhiyallahu anha will marry our beloved Prophet sallallahu alayhi wasallam in Jannah?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

According to a prophetic narration, recorded in Mu’jam Tabrāni, the Messenger of Allāh sallallahu alayhi wasallam said to Sayyidah A’ishah radhiyallahu anha that Allāh Almighty will marry him to (Sayyidah) Maryam radhiyallahu anha the daughter of Imrān, (Sayyidah) Kaltham radhiyallahu anha the sister of Sayyidunā Moosā alayhissalaam and (Sayyidah) Āsiya radhiyallahu anha the wife of Fir’awn.[1]  Some scholars such as Imām Dhahabi rahimahullah have classified this Hadeeth as weak due to a specific narrator being unreliable in the chain of transmission. Its weakness in the chain however, does not negate the possibility of the Holy Prophet sallallahu alayhi wasallam marrying them due to their lofty status. Their piety has been clearly expressed both in the Holy Qur’ān and in the prophetic tradition and for them becoming his wives does not go against his status. So Allāh Almighty can allow this to happen in Jannah if He so Wills. Its possibility can also be proven by the fact that Sayyidah Maryam radhiyallahu anha remained unmarried throughout her life whilst Sayyidah Āsiya radhiyallahu anha was married to a tyrant who relentlessly persecuted her because of her faith in Allāh Almighty and Prophet Moosā alayhissalaam. This inevitably terminates the marriage between them due to the clash of faiths. As for Kaltham radhiyallahu anha, the the Qur’ān and Hadeeth make no clear reference of her marriage in this world.  Allāh Almighty promises the believers, both men and women, on multiple occasions in the Holy Qur’ān that they will relish the company of their spouse(s) in Jannah. This suggests that every believing man and woman will marry those of their own choices and no one will be left unmarried, including the three aforesaid women. If viewed in this way then arguably, it is plausible that Allāh Almighty can permit the marriage of these three great women with the Messenger sallallahu alayhi wasallam.

Henceforth, though the authenticity of the Hadeeth is objectionable by some scholar, it does not conflict with the general Islamic principles and neither negates its possibility of happening. We must however consign its true knowledge to Allāh Almighty Himself.

 

 

[Allãh Knows Best]

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

[1] Tabrāni, Mu’jamul Kabeer No:8006

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ نُوحِ بْنِ حَرْبٍ الْعَسْكَرِيُّ، ثنا خَالِدُ بْنُ يُوسُفَ السَّمْتِيُّ، ثنا عَبْدُ النُّورِ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ، ثنا يُونُسُ بْنُ شُعَيْبٍ، عَنْ أَبِي أُمَامَةَ قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ رَسُولَ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَقُولُ لِعَائِشَةَ: «أَشَعَرْتِ أَنَّ اللهَ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ زَوَّجَنِي فِي الْجَنَّةِ مَرْيَمَ بِنْتَ عِمْرَانَ، وَكَلْثَمَ أُخْتَ مُوسَى، وَامْرَأَةَ فِرْعَوْنَ

Nikāh over the Phone

Nikāh over the Phone

26th July 2016

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: If a Nikāh was conducted over the phone without either of the parties being physically present in the same session, is the Nikāh valid?

 

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

 

Answer

In reference to your query about performing Nikāh over the phone, the necessary condition for the validity of Nikāh is that all the members; bride, the groom (or representative), witnesses and the Imām must be physically present in the same session. Nikāh being conducted over the phone suggests that all members were not physically present in the same session. Therefore, Islamically the Nikāh conducted in this manner is not valid.

It must be noted that if they consummated assuming that the Nikāh was valid then she must observe a waiting period of three menstrual cycles. This is to clear her womb before she decides to marry someone else. If no consummation took place then no waiting period is to be observed.

 

[Allãh Knows Best]

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

Examining Dead Bodies for Medical Research

Examining Dead Bodies for Medical Research

9th May 2016

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: As a medical student, part of the course syllabus in universities is to examine human organs of dead bodies, who consented to the use of their organs for medical research after their demise. As a Muslim student, are we permitted in the Shari’ah to examine the human organs and also dead bodies for medical research?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

There is a real need for Muslims to get into the medical profession. Great Muslim surgeons and doctors are known to have existed during the Islamic medieval period. As well as Islamic knowledge, worldly knowledge that serves the best interest for the Muslim community is essential. This includes the need for Muslim medical practitioners who appreciate Islamic values that can cater for the Muslim community’s needs.

However, due to the intricacy of the issue some preliminary principles are explained to widen the understanding around the issue. The underpinning principle to note is that in the Sharī’ah, a human body whether in the form of living or dead is highly dignified that bears many rights. It’s dignity is understood from a prophetic tradition wherein the Messenger of Allāh sallallahu alayhi wasallam said, ‘Breaking the bone of the dead is tantamount to breaking the bone of the living.[1] Hadeeth masters such as Hafiz ibn Hajr al-Asqalāni rahimahullah deduce from this that the dignity of the dead remains the same as if it was living, hence, its defilement even when it is dead is prohibited.[2] The Shari’ah requirement is that the body must be buried immediately after its demise and should not be objectified as a tool for one’s personal wishes or experiment. On this basis, the classical scholars forbade certain things like procuring (unnecessary) benefit from other human organs assuming it to be a defilement of the bodily dignity.[3]

On the other hand, the Sharī’ah is a religion of mercy and takes social circumstances and genuine necessity into consideration when following the legal principles proves extremely difficult in specific situations. In spite of forbidding the consumption of swine, the Holy Qur’ān permits eating it in situations of extreme duress provided that this is the only available animal for consumption. Furthermore, the classical jurists have allowed dissecting the dead body in cases of dire necessity such as performing a cesarean operation on a dead woman to extract the neonate (infant) when the neonate’s living is confirmed with certainty. [4] The jurists justify this through the legal maxim of choosing the lesser of the two harms, in that, dissecting the corpse of a woman to save the neonate’s life is a lesser harm than leaving it to die inside. This case example also conforms to the general Islamic principle of prohibited things become permitted in cases of genuine necessity, thus, human dissection is prohibited on a general scale but allowed in instances that serves the interests of a living human.

Once the above is understood, the issue at hand becomes clear. My general enquiry from reliable Muslim doctors confirms that medical students are obliged to attend sessions and sit in exams that involve dissecting the human body. If they don’t participate in those sessions then they cannot qualify as professional doctors which will ensue a greater loss for the Muslim community at large if there are no Muslim doctors. Contemporary scholars have allowed Muslim medical students to dissect human dead bodies to examine organs during unavoidable occasions.[5] This is justified on the basis of genuine necessity as well as public welfare that is, tolerating the smaller harm of experimenting on dead bodies to prevent the greater harm of having no qualified Muslim doctors in the society.  This general concession must be accompanied with the following conditions;

  1. Obtained prior permission from the deceased or his/her heirs for experimental purposes.
  2. Experiment must be carried out in a manner where the dead body is not treated in an undignified manner.
  3. To avoid looking at the awrah (private parts) of the dead body as much as possible especially those that causes arousal but if impossible, then to limit the viewing of the private parts only to the bear necessity.
  4. Any body parts not required for experimentation should be buried.

                                                               

[Allãh Knows Best]

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

[1] Sunna Abu Dawood No 3207, Kitabul Janaiz, Hadeeth no: 3207

عَنْ عَائِشَةَ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ:كَسْرُ عَظْمِ الْمَيِّتِ كَكَسْرِهِ حَيًّا

[2] Ibn Hajr, Fathul Bhari, Bāb Kathratun Nisā p. 113 vol 9

وَيُسْتَفَادُ مِنْهُ أَنَّ حُرْمَةَ الْمُؤْمِنِ بَعْدَ مَوْتِهِ بَاقِيَةٌ كَمَا كَانَتْ فِي حَيَاتِهِ وَفِيهِ حَدِيثُ كَسْرِ عَظْمِ الْمُؤْمِنِ مَيِّتًا كَكَسْرِهِ حَيًّا أَخْرَجَهُ أَبُو دَاوُدَ وبن ماجة وَصَححهُ بن حِبَّانِ

[3] Fatawa Hindiyyah, Book of Karahiyya, p. 434 vol 5

لِانْتِفَاعُ بِأَجْزَاءِ الْآدَمِيِّ لَمْ يَجُزْ قِيلَ لِلنَّجَاسَةِ وَقِيلَ لِلْكَرَامَةِ هُوَ الصَّحِيحُ

Ibn Nujaym, al-Bahrur Raiq,  vol. 6, p. 133.

(قَوْلُهُ وَشَعْرِ الْإِنْسَانِ وَالِانْتِفَاعِ بِهِ) أَيْ لَمْ يَجُزْ بَيْعُهُ وَالِانْتِفَاعُ بِهِ لِأَنَّ الْآدَمِيَّ مُكَرَّمٌ غَيْرُ مُبْتَذَلٍ فَلَا يَجُوزُ أَنْ يَكُونَ شَيْءٌ مِنْ أَجْزَائِهِ مُهَانًا مُبْتَذَلًا

[4] Fatawa Hindiyyah, Book of Karahiyya,  Bāb Fima Yasa’u min Jarahāt Bani Ādam p. 440 vol 5

فِي فَتَاوَى أَبِي اللَّيْثِ – رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى – فِي امْرَأَةٍ حَامِلٍ مَاتَتْ وَعُلِمَ أَنَّ مَا فِي بَطْنِهَا حَيٌّ فَإِنَّهُ يَشُقُّ بَطْنَهَا مِنْ الشِّقِّ الْأَيْسَرِ وَكَذَلِكَ إذَا كَانَ أَكْبَرُ رَأْيِهِمْ أَنَّهُ حَيٌّ يَشُقُّ بَطْنَهَا كَذَا فِي الْمُحِيطِ

Badai. Sanai, Kitabul Isthsan p. 130 vol 5

حَامِلٌ مَاتَتْ فَاضْطَرَبَ فِي بَطْنِهَا وَلَدٌ فَإِنْ كَانَ فِي أَكْبَرِ الرَّأْيِ أَنَّهُ حَيٌّ يُشَقُّ بَطْنُهَا لِأَنَّا اُبْتُلِينَا بِبَلِيَّتَيْنِ فَنَخْتَارُ أَهْوَنَهُمَا وَشَقُّ بَطْنِ الْأُمِّ الْمَيِّتَةِ أَهْوَنُ مِنْ إهْلَاكِ الْوَلَدِ الْحَيِّ.

[5] Az-Zuhaili Fiqhul Islami wa addilathu p. 440 vol 9   

يجوز التشريح عند الضرورة أو الحاجة بقصد التعليم لأغراض طبية، أو لمعرفة سبب الوفاة وإثبات الجناية على المتهم بالقتل ونحو ذلك لأغراض جنائية إذا توقف عليها الوصول إلى الحق في أمر الجناية، للأدلة الدالة على وجوب العدل في الأحكام

First Born Child Being a Female

7th May 2016

 

Question: Kindly tell me the status of the Hadeeth “Lucky is the woman whose first child is a daughter”

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

 

Answer

The Hadeeth has been transmitted by Ibn Asākir and Daylami from two companions; Sayyidunā Wathila Ibn Asqa radhiyallahu anhu and Sayyidah Āisha radhiyallahu anha that blessed is that women whose first born child is a girl. This is an isolated report however and not commonly found in any of the major Hadeeth works. Hadeeth critics such as Imām Sakhāwi rahimahullah classify this narration as week. Ibn al-Qayyum al-Jawzi rahimahullah, known for his rigidness in Hadeeth classification, renders this report as fabricated.[1] Thus, the authenticity of the above Hadeeth is questionable. This however does not negate the merits of bearing female children in general as Islām honours daughters and not just sons. The Messenger of Allāh sallallahu alayhi wasallam promised Jannah to those parents who nurture their daughter(s) according to the Islamic principles, do not inflict harm upon them, do not prefer sons over them (in order to degrade daughters) and also treat them with kindness.[2] In another report, the Messenger of Allāh sallallahu alayhi wasallam said, “Whoever endures (the responsibility in nurturing and providing for them) until they reach puberty (and ready for marriage) then he will come on the day of judgment whereas me and him (like this), joining his fingers.”[3] 

Thus, daughters in general are a source of blessing in Islam. The Hadeeth you quoted about a first child being born is weak but other Ahadeeth such as the one above explain the merits of rearing daughters in general.

 

 

 [Allãh Knows Best]

 

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam            

JKN Fatawa Department

 

[1] al-kafi, vol 2, page 6

Faidul Qadeer, (No: 8237 6/11)

(من بركة المرأة) على زوجها كما جاء مصرحا في رواية (تبكيرها بالأنثى) تمامه عند الخطيب والديلمي ألم تسمع قوله تعالى {يهب لمن يشاء إناثا} فبدأ بالاناث (ابن عساكر) وكذا الخطيب والديلمي كلهم (عن واثلة) بن الأسقع ورواه الديلمي عن عائشة مرفوعا بلفظ من بركة المرأة على زوجها تيسير مهرها وأن تبكر بالإناث قال السخاوي: وهما ضعيفان اه بل أورده ابن الجوزي في الموضوعات فقال: موضوع

[2] Musnad Imām Ahmad No: 1957

عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: ” مَنْ وُلِدَتْ لَهُ ابْنَةٌ، فَلَمْ يَئِدْهَا، وَلَمْ يُهِنْهَا، وَلَمْ يُؤْثِرْ وَلَدَهُ عَلَيْهَا – يَعْنِي الذَّكَرَ – أَدْخَلَهُ اللهُ بِهَا الْجَنَّةَ “

[3] Saheeh Muslim No: 149

عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ، قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: «مَنْ عَالَ جَارِيَتَيْنِ حَتَّى تَبْلُغَا، جَاءَ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ أَنَا وَهُوَ» وَضَمَّ أَصَابِعَهُ

 

When does Ta’ziyyat Begin?

25th April 2016

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Q: 1) When does the three days Taziyyat period start? Is it after the person’s death or after burial and can one do tazi’yyat after three days?

2) Should the visitors demand food from the bereaved household members to prepare food for them?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

 

Answer

  1. Ta’ziyyat (bereavement) is for three days which begins from the person’s death and not necessarily from the burial time. Ta’ziyyat should not be made after the third day of the person’s death except if either a bereaved family member or those wanting to express their condolences were absent during those three days. [1] Other than that, Islām does not recognise extending the mourning period beyond three days.
  2. Visitors who come to express their condolences should not demand prepared food from the bereaved family. Scholars have condemned the culture of the bereaved family preparing food for the guests and regard it as a bid’ah (innovation) practice. [2] In fact the guests are encouraged to prepare cooked food for the bereaved family due to their engagement in the moaning of their deceased. This has been reported from the Messenger of Allāh sallallahu alayhi wasallam as an act of courteousness and compassion.[3] In today’s customary practice where the bereaved family members prepare food for the visitors on the third or fourth day is an innovation in the religion and a sin. To refrain from such practice is necessary and as such, one must avoid partaking in the meal as much as possible.[4]

 

 

[Allãh Knows Best]

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

 

[1] Fatāwa Hindiyyah, Kitābus Salāh, Bāb fil Janāiz,  vol 1 p. 183

وَوَقْتُهَا مِنْ حِينِ يَمُوتُ إلَى ثَلَاثَةِ أَيَّامٍ وَيُكْرَهُ بَعْدَهَا إلَّا أَنْ يَكُونَ الْمُعَزِّي أَوْ الْمُعَزَّى إلَيْهِ غَائِبًا فَلَا بَأْسَ بِهَا وَهِيَ بَعْدَ الدَّفْنِ أَوْلَى مِنْهَا قَبْلَهُ وَهَذَا إذَا لَمْ يُرَ مِنْهُمْ جَزَعٌ شَدِيدٌ فَإِنْ رُئِيَ ذَلِكَ قُدِّمَتْ التَّعْزِيَةُ

[2] Ibn Ābideen al-Shāmi Kitābus Salāh, Bāb Salātil Janāiz,  vol 3 p. 148

وَيُكْرَهُ اتِّخَاذُ الضِّيَافَةِ مِنْ الطَّعَامِ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَيِّتِ لِأَنَّهُ شُرِعَ فِي السُّرُورِ لَا فِي الشُّرُورِ، وَهِيَ بِدْعَةٌ مُسْتَقْبَحَةٌ: وَرَوَى الْإِمَامُ أَحْمَدُ وَابْنُ مَاجَهْ بِإِسْنَادٍ صَحِيحٍ عَنْ جَرِيرِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ قَالَ ” كُنَّا نَعُدُّ الِاجْتِمَاعَ إلَى أَهْلِ الْمَيِّتِ وَصُنْعَهُمْ الطَّعَامَ مِنْ النِّيَاحَةِ

[3] Mishkāt No: 1739

وَعَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ جَعْفَرٍ قَالَ: لَمَّا جَاءَ نَعْيُ جَعْفَرٍ قَالَ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسلم صانعوا لِآلِ جَعْفَرٍ طَعَامًا فَقَدْ أَتَاهُمْ مَا يَشْغَلُهُمْ

[4] Mirqāt Sharh Mishkāt Bāb al-Bukā alal Mayit, vol 3, p. 1241

قَالَ الطِّيبِيُّ: دَلَّ عَلَى أَنَّهُ يُسْتَحَبُّ لِلْأَقَارِبِ وَالْجِيرَانِ تَهْيِئَةُ طَعَامٍ لِأَهْلِ الْمَيِّتِ اهـ. وَالْمُرَادُ طَعَامٌ يُشْبِعُهُمْ يَوْمَهُمْ وَلَيْلَتَهُمْ، فَإِنَّ الْغَالِبَ أَنَّ الْحُزْنَ الشَّاغِلَ عَنْ تَنَاوُلِ الطَّعَامِ لَا يَسْتَمِرُّ أَكْثَرَ مِنْ يَوْمٍ، وَقِيلَ: يُحْمَلُ لَهُمْ طَعَامٌ إِلَى ثَلَاثَةِ أَيَّامٍ مُدَّةَ التَّعْزِيَةِ، ثُمَّ إِذَا صُنِعَ لَهُمْ مَا ذَكَرَ مِنْ أَنْ يُلِحَّ عَلَيْهِمْ فِي الْأَكْلِ لِئَلَّا يَضْعُفُوا بِتَرْكِهِ اسْتِحْيَاءً، أَوْ لِفَرْطِ جَزَعٍ، وَاصْطِنَاعُهُ مِنْ بَعِيدٍ أَوْ قَرِيبٍ لِلنَّائِحَاتِ شَدِيدُ التَّحْرِيمِ ; لِأَنَّهُ إِعَانَةٌ عَلَى الْمَعْصِيَةِ، وَاصْطِنَاعُ أَهْلِ الْبَيْتِ لَهُ لِأَجْلِ اجْتِمَاعِ النَّاسِ عَلَيْهِ بِدْعَةٌ مَكْرُوهَةٌ، بَلْ صَحَّ عَنْ جَرِيرٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ: كُنَّا نَعُدُّهُ مِنَ النِّيَاحَةِ، وَهُوَ ظَاهِرٌ فِي التَّحْرِيمِ. قَالَ الْغَزَالِيُّ: وَيُكْرَهُ الْأَكْلُ مِنْهُ، قُلْتُ: وَهَذَا إِذَا لَمْ يَكُنْ مِنْ مَالِ الْيَتِيمِ أَوِ الْغَائِبِ، وَإِلَّا فَهُوَ حَرَامٌ بِلَا خِلَافٍ. (رَوَاهُ التِّرْمِذِيُّ) وَقَالَ: حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ نَقَلَهُ مِيرَكُ. (وَأَبُو دَاوُدَ، وَابْنُ مَاجَهْ) قَالَ مِيرَكُ: رَوَاهُ النَّسَائِيُّ.

 

Chewing Food Whilst Adhān is Called Out

25th April 2016

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question. If during Suhoor time whilst they are chewing or have a morsel of food in their hand, the Adhān is called out then is it necessary to discard the food immediately upon hearing it?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the Name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

 

Answer

The end time of Suhoor whereby the fasting time begins is based on the clear appearance of the dawn (Subhu Sādiq). The Adhān merely indicates to the time of Subhu Sādiq. A person however is given the concession to finish off the remaining morsel during the Adhān. The Messenger of Allāh sallallahu alayhi wasallam said, “When you hear the Adhān (of Fajr) whilst the utensil (i.e. food and drink) is in your hand then he should not put it down until he fulfils his need (finishes his food).[1]

Some scholars interpret this Hadeeth to suggest that it indicates to the concession given to eating until the clear appearance (Tabyeen) of the Subhu Sādiq since the beginning time of fast is based on the time, not the Adhān itself.[2] However, this is near impossible for us as most people are inexperienced in determining the setting of the dawn break due to our dependence on the Salāh time table. Each person must therefore close their fast according to their local time table. Based on the Hadeeth though, one is at liberty to finish the remaining morsel or drink during the Adhān. This does not imply that one can begin eating a full meal during the Adhān and continue to eat thereafter. This will otherwise break the fast and necessitate Qadha.

 

[Allãh Knows Best]

 

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

 

 

[1] Abū Dāwood No: 2350

عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: «إِذَا سَمِعَ أَحَدُكُمُ النِّدَاءَ وَالْإِنَاءُ عَلَى يَدِهِ، فَلَا يَضَعْهُ حَتَّى يَقْضِيَ حَاجَتَهُ مِنْهُ»

[2] Maulāna Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri, Badhl Majhood pp. 489-491 vol 8

 

A Menstruating Woman Intending to Fast After becoming Clean

A Menstruating Woman Intending to Fast After becoming Clean

25th April 2016

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

 Question. Is it permissible for a woman who during Ramadhān who becomes clean from her menses just before mid-day time and there and then makes the intention of fasting and if so, is her fast valid?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the Name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

 

Answer

The underlying principle to remember is that purity from menstruation (as well as post-natal bleeding) throughout the fasting period; from Subhu Sādiq until sunset, is mandatory. Any portion of the time spent during this period even momentarily in menstrual state renders the fast invalid. The entire fasting period is not devisable according to the Hanafies but rather one single time period. Anything affecting the former period e.g. Subhu Sādiq time equally affects the latter period also. So for her to make the intention of fast even before mid-day will not suffice and must make Qadha of that day.[1] She is still required to do Imsāk – which means to assimilate a fasting person by refraining from eating and drinking throughout the remaining day even though she has to make up for it later.[2]

 

[Allãh Knows Best]

 

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

 

 

[1] Durrul Mukhtar wa Shāmi Kitāb Sawm Bāb Ma yufsidu Sawm wa ma la Yufsidu p. 385 vol 3

وَلَوْ نَوَى الْحَائِضُ وَالنُّفَسَاءُ لَمْ يَصِحَّ أَصْلًا لِلْمُنَافِي أَوَّلَ الْوَقْتِ وَهُوَ لَا يَتَجَزَّأُ

(قَوْلُهُ: وَلَوْ نَوَى الْحَائِضُ وَالنُّفَسَاءُ) أَيْ قَبْلَ نِصْفِ النَّهَارِ إذَا طَهُرَتَا فِيهِ (قَوْلُهُ: لَمْ يَصِحَّ أَصْلًا) أَيْ لَا فَرْضًا وَلَا نَفْلًا شُرُنْبُلَالِيَّةٌ (قَوْلُهُ: لِلْمُنَافِي إلَخْ) أَيْ فَإِنَّ كُلًّا مِنْ الْحَيْضِ وَالنِّفَاسِ مَنَافٍ لِصِحَّةِ الصَّوْمِ مُطْلَقًا؛ لِأَنَّ فَقْدَهُمَا شَرْطٌ لِصِحَّتِهِ وَالصَّوْمُ عِبَادَةٌ وَاحِدَةٌ لَا يَتَجَزَّأُ، فَإِذَا وُجِدَ الْمُنَافِي فِي أَوَّلِهِ تَحَقَّقَ حُكْمُهُ فِي بَاقِيهِ

[2] Shāmi Kitāb Sawm Bāb Ma yufsidu Sawm wa ma la Yufsidu p. 384 vol 3

وَالْأَصْلُ فِي هَذِهِ الْمَسَائِلِ أَنَّ كُلَّ مَنْ صَارَ فِي آخِرِ النَّهَارِ بِصِفَةٍ لَوْ كَانَ أَوَّلَ النَّهَارِ عَلَيْهَا لَلَزِمَهُ الصَّوْمُ فَعَلَيْهِ الْإِمْسَاكُ كَمَا فِي الْخُلَاصَةِ وَالنِّهَايَةِ وَالْعِنَايَةِ لَكِنَّهُ غَيْرُ جَامِعٍ إذْ لَا يَدْخُلُ فِيهِ مَنْ أَكَلَ فِي رَمَضَانَ عَمْدًا

Fluorescein Angiography and Fast

25th April 2016

 السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question. Does Fluorescein angiography test break one’s fast?

 

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the Name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

 

Answer

Fluorescein angiography is an eye test that uses a special dye and camera to look at blood flow in the retina and choroid, the two layers situated in the back of the eye. During this process, the patient is given eye drops for enlarging the pupil just enough to see the two back layers.[1] The Hanafi jurists do not consider putting medicine or applying anything into the eyes as a breaker of the fast even though the taste is felt in the throat.[2] The companions are reported to have applied Surma (antimony) whilst fasting, hence permissible.[3] The similar ruling can apply to fluorescein angiography as well so in principle it should not break the fast.

 

[Allãh Knows Best]

 

Written by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

 

[1] See http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003846.htm

[2] Fatawa hindiyyah Kitāb Sawm Bāb Ma yufsidu Sawm wa ma lā Yufsidu p. 224 vol 1

وَلَوْ أَقْطَرَ شَيْئًا مِنْ الدَّوَاءِ فِي عَيْنِهِ لَا يُفْطِرُ صَوْمَهُ عِنْدَنَا، وَإِنْ وَجَدَ طَعْمَهُ فِي حَلْقِهِ

[3] Abū Dāwood No:2378

عَنْ أَنَسِ بْنِ مَالِكٍ،اَنَّهُ كَانَ يَكْتَحِلُ وَهُوَ صَائِمٌ