Paying Zakāt on Money Loaned Ten Years Ago onto Someone

Paying Zakāt on Money Loaned Ten Years Ago onto Someone

29th January 2026

 

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

 

Question: If I lent money out to a relative 10 years ago, I still haven’t received it back. I don’t know when I’ll get it back, as there’s no date stipulated. Must I still pay Zakāt on it over the years until he gives it or not? Also, if he happens to return it, then must I still pay Zakāt over the previous years too?

 

 الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

 

Answer:

As a general principal, the creditor is obliged to pay Zakāt on the money he lends since he still maintains ownership of the money (even if he does not yet physically possess it) irrespective of the number of years.[1] The Zakāt due upon him can either be paid altogether at once when he receives the money, or he can pay yearly on the amount owed to him.[2] If he pays yearly, he will deduct 2.5% of the amount he lent each year until that money is returned. If he pays altogether, then he will deduct the amount the Zakāt due on him each year.[3]

Based on the above, if you lent money to a relative 10 years ago and have still not received the money back, then so long as they acknowledge that they owe you and promise to pay you, you are still obliged to pay Zakāt on the amount that you are owed. Since there is no date stipulated and you are not aware when you will receive the money back, you could either pay Zakāt yearly on the amount lent or choose to pay once the money is returned (see footnote 3 on how to calculate Zakāt on previous years). The same ruling will apply if he does happen to return the money, back to you.

If, however, the debtor refuses to acknowledge any debt owed to you or there is no way of retrieving that money and lose all hope of gaining access to it then the Zakāt of the previous years now drops because it is outside of your ownership.

 

Allāh Knows Best

 

 

Written by:  Apa Kinza          Reviewed by: Mufti Abdul Waheed

Attested by: Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam        

JKN Fatawa Department

 

 

[1] [Bahru Raaiq sharh kanz dqaa’iq, zayn deen ibn nujaym, kitab zakah, sharth wujub zakah, vol 2, pge 223]

 قَسَّمَ أَبُو حَنِيفَةَ الدَّيْنَ عَلَى ثَلَاثَةِ أَقْسَامٍ: قَوِيٌّ، وَهُوَ بَدَلُ الْقَرْضِ، وَمَالُ التِّجَارَةِ، وَمُتَوَسِّطٌ، وَهُوَ بَدَلُ مَا لَيْسَ لِلتِّجَارَةِ كَثَمَنِ ثِيَابِ الْبِذْلَةِ وَعَبْدِ الْخِدْمَةِ وَدَارِ السُّكْنَى، وَضَعِيفٌ، وَهُوَ بَدَلُ مَا لَيْسَ بِمَالٍ كَالْمَهْرِ وَالْوَصِيَّةِ، وَبَدَلِ الْخُلْعِ وَالصُّلْحِ عَنْ دَمِ الْعَمْدِ وَالدِّيَةِ، وَبَدَلِ الْكِتَابَةِ وَالسِّعَايَةِ فَفِي الْقَوِيِّ تَجِبُ الزَّكَاةُ إذَا حَالَ الْحَوْلُ، وَيَتَرَاخَى الْقَضَاءُ إلَى أَنْ يَقْبِضَ أَرْبَعِينَ دِرْهَمًا فَفِيهَا دِرْهَمٌ، وَكَذَا فِيمَا زَادَ بِحِسَابِهِ، وَفِي الْمُتَوَسِّطِ لَا تَجِبُ مَا لَمْ يَقْبِضْ نِصَابًا، وَيُعْتَبَرُ لِمَا مَضَى مِنْ الْحَوْلِ فِي صَحِيحِ الرِّوَايَةِ، وَفِي الضَّعِيفِ لَا تَجِبُ مَا لَمْ يَقْبِضْ نِصَابًا وَيَحُولُ الْحَوْلُ بَعْدَ الْقَبْضِ عَلَيْهِ،

 

[2]  [Badai’u sanai’i fi tarteeb shari, imam al kasaani, kitab zakah, fasl sharaithu    fardiyyatu zakah, vol 2, pge 10]

وَقَالَ أَبُو يُوسُفَ وَمُحَمَّدٌ: الدُّيُونُ كُلُّهَا سَوَاءٌ، وَكُلُّهَا قَوِيَّةٌ تَجِبُ الزَّكَاةُ فِيهَا قَبْلَ الْقَبْضِ إلَّا الدِّيَةَ عَلَى الْعَاقِلَةِ وَمَالَ الْكِتَابَةِ فَإِنَّهُ لَا تَجِبُ الزَّكَاةُ فِيهَا أَصْلًا مَا لَمْ تُقْبَضْ وَيَحُولُ عَلَيْهَا الْحَوْلُ.

وَجْهُ قَوْلِهِمَا أَنَّ مَا سِوَى بَدَلِ الْكِتَابَةِ وَالدِّيَةِ عَلَى الْعَاقِلَةِ مِلْكُ صَاحِبِ الدَّيْنِ مِلْكًا مُطْلَقًا رَقَبَةً وَيَدًا؛ لِتَمَكُّنِهِ مِنْ الْقَبْضِ بِقَبْضِ بَدَلِهِ وَهُوَ الْعَيْنُ فَتَجِبُ فِيهِ الزَّكَاةُ كَسَائِرِ الْأَعْيَانِ الْمَمْلُوكَةِ مِلْكًا مُطْلَقًا إلَّا أَنَّهُ لَا يُخَاطَبُ بِالْأَدَاءِ لِلْحَالِ

 

[3] For more details on how a creditor must calculate Zakāt on previous years, click the link below.

https://jknfatawa.co.uk/how-should-a-creditor-calculate-zakat-on-the-previous-years/

 

The Minimum Number of Congregants for Jumu’ah

The Minimum Number of Congregants for Jumu’ah

20th January 2026

 

السَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ اللَّهِ وَبَرَكَاتُه

Question: In the Hanafi fiqh, we need total of 4 persons for Jumu’ah. For example, in army we try to find Muslims and we only have 3, can we take the opinion of Imam Abu Yusuf of 3 persons and do Jumu’ah?

 

الْجَوَابُ حَامِدًا وَمُصَلِّيًا

In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer: The minimum number required for the validity of Jumuʿah according to Imam Abu Hanifah rahimahullah and Imam Muhammad rahimahullah is three people besides the Imam (i.e. four in total). According to Imam Abu Yusuf rahimahullah, two people besides the Imam is sufficient (i.e. three in total). The relied upon (muʿtamad) position in the Hanafi School is the position of Imam Abu Hanifah rahimahullah and Imam Muhammad rahimahullah. Therefore, if only three Muslims in total are present (including the Imam), then Jumuʿah should not be performed; instead, they must pray Zuhr Salah. [1]  As a default, the relied upon position must be adopted. Adopting a position contrary to the relied upon one in the school is not permitted unless in cases of necessity. You must therefore, pray Zuhr in the case of not having minimum three congregants. [2]

 

Allāh Knows Best

 

Written by:  Maulana Nabil Ahmed         Reviewed by: Mufti Abdul Waheed

Attested by: Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam      

JKN Fatawa Department

 

 

[1] Bada’i as Sana’i  kitabus Salah, babul Jumuah vol 1, page 268

وَأَمَّا الْكَلَامُ مَعَ أَصْحَابِنَا فَوَجْهُ قَوْلِ أَبِي يُوسُفَ إنْ شُرِطَ أَدَاءُ الْجُمُعَةِ بِجَمَاعَةٍ وَقَدْ وُجِدَ؛ لِأَنَّهُمَا مَعَ الْإِمَامِ ثَلَاثَةٌ وَهِيَ جَمْعٌ مُطْلَقٌ وَلِهَذَا يَتَقَدَّمُهُمَا الْإِمَامُ وَيَصْطَفَّانِ خَلْفَهُ وَلَهُمَا أَنَّ الْجَمْعَ الْمُطْلَقَ شَرْطُ انْعِقَادِ الْجُمُعَةِ فِي حَقِّ كُلِّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمْ، وَشَرْطُ جَوَازِ صَلَاةِ كُلِّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمْ يَنْبَغِي أَنْ يَكُونَ سِوَاهُ فَيَحْصُلَ هَذَا الشَّرْطُ ثُمَّ يُصَلِّي، وَلَا يَحْصُلُ هَذَا الشَّرْطُ إلَّا إذَا كَانَ سِوَى الْإِمَامِ ثَلَاثَةٌ إذْ لَوْ كَانَ مَعَ الْإِمَام ثَلَاثَةٌ لَا يُوجَدُ فِي حَقِّ كُلِّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمْ إلَّا اثْنَانِ وَالْمُثَنَّى لَيْسَ بِجَمْعٍ مُطْلَقٍ،

 

[2]  Rasmul Mufti.

لا يُعمل بالقول المرجوح إلا لضرورة

 

If Everything is Decreed then why Should Some People go to Hell?

If Everything is Decreed then why Should Some People go to Hell?

20th January 2026

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: If everything is decreed for everyone’s destiny then why should some people go to hell? Is it fair that Allāh has already decided where their final abode is?

 

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer: In response to your inquiry, belief in divine decree is firmly established in Islam. Divine decree is a manifestation of Allāh’s Infinite knowledge of His creation. Allāh knew all things; their lifespan, provision, deeds, birth, death and their outcomes, before bringing them into existence and recorded them according to His knowledge, will and wisdom. This belief does not mean that humans are forced to act, nor does it imply injustice on Allāh’s part.[1] Human beings possess intellect to make certain choices and given some control over them to do right and wrong under Allāh’s will, and hence they act accordingly and will be judged by their deeds. For this reason, reward and punishment are connected to what people choose to do.[2] If someone is decreed to go to hell then it is because of their own actions.

Allāh enables each person to follow the path they incline towards. According to a prophet narration, each person is facilitated for those actions they are destined for. Those who seek guidance are assisted with good deeds and those who turn away from guidance indulge in sins. [3]

It is important to note that accountability applies to actions done knowingly and intentionally. Mistakes, forgetfulness, and actions done under compulsion are not punished. Allāh does not hold into account nor punish those actions beyond one’s natural capacity. The people of Hell are punished because of their disbelief, rebellion or sins after when guidance has been made clear to them.[4]

 

 

[Allāh Knows Best]

Written by:  Apa Sumayya Qazi         Reviewed by: Mufti Abdul Waheed

Attested by: Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

 

 

[1] Quran, Surah Qamar, Ayah 49.

اِناَّ كُلًَّ شَيْءٍ خَلَقْناهُ بِقَدْرٍ.

 

Sahih Muslim, Vol 1, Hadith 8.

قال النبي ﷺ أن تؤمن بالله وملائكته ورسله واليوم الآخر وتؤمن بالقدر خيره و شرّه.

 

Imam al-Tahawi, Sharah-Al Aqidah Al-Tahawi, pg 20-25.

وعلم الله تعالى ما العباد عاملون قبل أن يخلقهم.

 

Sahih Bukhari, Vol 5, Hadith 3208.

قال النبي ﷺ فيكتب رزقه و أجله و عمله و شقي أو سعيد.

 

Quran, Surah Hadid, Ayah 22.

مَا اَصاَبَ مِنْ مُصِيْبَةٍ فِيً الأرضِ وَ لَا اَنْفُسِهكُم اِلَّا فِي كِتاَبٍ مِنْ قَبْلَ اَنْ نّبْرَأَهَا.

 

[2] Quran, Surah Kahf, Ayah 29.

فَمَنْ شاءَ فَلْيُؤمِنْ وَ مَنْ شَاءَ فَلْيَكْفُر.

 Quran, Surah Al-Bakra, Ayah 286.

لَا يُكَّلِفُ اللهُ نَفْساً اِلَّا وُسْعَها.

 

 

[3] Sahih Bukhari, Vol 6, Hadith 4949.

قال رسول اللهُ ﷺ اعملوا فكل ميسر لما خلق له.

 

 

[4] Sunan Ibne Majah, Vol 3, Hadith 2045.

قال رسول اللهُ ﷺ إن الله تجاوز لي عن أمتي الخطاً والنسيان وما استكرهوا عليه

Quran, Surah Al-Nisa, Ayah 40.

اِنَّ اللهَ لَا يُظْلِمُ مِثْقاَلَ ذَرَّةٍ .

Quran, Fussilat, Ayah 46.

وَمَا رَبُّكَ بِظَّلامٍ لِلعَبِيْدِ.

Optical Aid and Moon Sighting A Critical

Download Article – Optical-Aid-and-Moon-Sighting-A-Critical

What to Do If You Menstruate Before Ihrām?

7th January 2026

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

 Question: I am 14 years old, and I am due to travel for Umrah tomorrow. We will be spending 5 days in Makkah and two days in Madīnah and then return home. I have just started my first day of my period. What am I supposed to do if my periods extend to more than 5 days? Should I not make the intention of Ihrām at all and if I do, must I discard it and how?

 الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

 

Answer:

In reference to your query, as a general principle it is not allowed for anyone to cross the Mīqāt (boundary) without being in the state of Ihrām. This ruling applies regardless of one enters it with the intention of Umrah or Hajj. Crossing the boundary without Ihrām makes one liable of dam (offering a compensatory sacrifice of a sheep, goat, or one-seventh share of a large animal).[1] The ruling also applies to menstruating women.[2]

Based on your enquiry, crossing the boundary without Ihrām is not an option for you. You must enter Ihrām and during your stay, you will remain in this state whilst adhering to the laws of Ihrām as purity is necessary for Tawāf. [3] If you become clean in time, you will perform ghusl and then perform your Umrah. Otherwise, you may exit the Ihrām as a last resort (should your menses continue throughout your stay), give the penalty of a dam and perform your Umrah as Qadhā at your earliest opportunity.

 

[Allāh Knows Best]

 

Written by:  Apa Kinza          Reviewed by: Mufti Abdul Waheed

Attested by: Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam        

JKN Fatawa Department

 

 

[1] [Al Binayah sharhul Hidayah, Badru Deen Al Ayni, kitab Hajj, fasl dukhulul afaaqi makkata bighayri ihram, vol 4, pge 143]

 بخلاف ما إذا قصد أداء النسك) ش: أي الحج والعمرة، حيث لا يجوز دخوله بلا إحرام ولا مجاوزة الميقات بالإحرام إن خرج عن الميقات م: (لأنه يتحقق أحيانا) ش: أي لأن قصد من كان داخل الميقات أن النسك متحقق في بعض الأحيان

 

[2] Fatawah hindiyyah alamgheeriyyah, muhammad awrnak alamgheer, kitab hajj, baab fi mawaqeetul ihram, vol 1, pge 221]

 بَابِ دُخُولِ مَكَّةَ بِغَيْرِ إحْرَامٍ

وَلَا يَجُوزُ لِلْآفَاقِيِّ أَنْ يَدْخُلَ مَكَّةَ بِغَيْرِ إحْرَامٍ نَوَى النُّسُكَ أَوْ لَا وَلَوْ دَخَلَهَا فَعَلَيْهِ حَجَّةٌ أَوْ عُمْرَةٌ كَذَا فِي مُحِيطِ السَّرَخْسِيِّ فِي

 

 

[3] [Fathul Qadeer lil kamaal ibn humaam, Ibn Humaam, kitab Taharah, baab haydh wa istihadha, vol 1, pge 166]

قَوْلُهُ وَلَا تَطُوفُ بِالْبَيْتِ) لِأَنَّهُ فِي الْمَسْجِدِ فَيَحْرُمُ، وَلَوْ فَعَلَتْهُ الْحَائِضُ كَانَتْ عَاصِيَةً مُعَاقَبَةً وَتَتَحَلَّلُ بِهِ مِنْ إحْرَامِهَا لِطَوَافِ الزِّيَارَةِ وَعَلَيْهَا بَدَنَةٌ كَطَوَافِ الْجُنُبِ، هَذَا وَالْأَوْلَى عَدَمُ الِاقْتِصَارِ عَلَى التَّعْلِيلِ الْمَذْكُورِ، فَإِنَّ حُرْمَةَ الطَّوَافِ جُنُبًا لَيْسَ مَنْظُورًا فِيهِ إلَى دُخُولِ الْمَسْجِدِ بِالذَّاتِ، بَلْ لِأَنَّ الطَّهَارَةَ وَاجِبَةٌ فِي الطَّوَافِ، فَلَوْ لَمْ يَكُنْ ثَمَّةَ مَسْجِدٍ حَرُمَ عَلَيْهَا الطَّوَافُ

Can Dua Change Taqdeer (Fate)?

12th December 2025

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: Does Dua change taqdeer? I heard somewhere it does so could you provide evidence from Hadith for this?  If so, does that mean by doing dua if death was written for you, then by doing dua you can extend your life? Or by doing dua, if illness was written for you, that you can stop illness happening?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer: In response to your inquiry, dua is among the most effective means through which Allah may repel or delay certain manifestations of taqdeer (divine decree). This is established from Hadith in which Prophet sallallahu alayhi wasallam stated: ‘Nothing repels Divine decree except dua’[1]

It must be understood that Allāh Almighty’s decree is of two kinds: one which is absolute and unchangeable, and the other which is conditional, wherein outcomes are dependent on certain causes such as dua, charity, repentance, and maintaining ties of kinship. The Hadith is referring to conditional decree.[2]

Allāh Almighty already knows from His eternal knowledge whether a person will make dua and the effect of that dua. He may, through barakah of dua and righteous deeds, remove or delay a calamity, avert illness, or bless a person’s life with beneficial years. This does not mean that Allah’s eternal knowledge or absolute decree changes. Rather, the dua itself was written as part of decree and serves as a cause for the resulting outcome.

If calamity or illness has been written in a conditional form, Allāh may, through dua, repentance, good actions, remove or postpone that hardship. Likewise, with dua and righteousness, a person’s life may be extended in the sense of being blessed with productive and peaceful years, or causes of death may be averted by the will of Allah. Acceptance of dua rests solely with Allah’s wisdom. Dua is both an act of worship and a means decreed by Allah for the attainment of His mercy.

[Allāh Knows Best]

Written by:  Apa Sumayya Qazi         Reviewed by: Mufti Abdul Waheed

Attested by: Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

[1] Tirmidhi, Hadith no. 2139.

لا يرد القدر إلا الدعاء

 

[2] Sharah Sahih Muslim, Vol 16, pg 208-209.

قال النووي رحمه الله: قال العلماء: هذا في القدر المعلق  الذي تكتبه الملائكة، أما القدر المبرم فلا تبديل فيه.

 

Ibne HajarAsklani, Fath-Al-Bari, Vol 10, pg 417.

قال ابن حجر العسقلاني رحمه الله: والمراد بزيادة العمر: الزيادة في القدر المعلق، أما القدر المبرم فلا يقع فيه تغيير.

 

Imam al-Tahawi, Sharah-Al Aqidah Al-Tahawiyyah, pg 266-267.

قال ابن أبي العز الحنفي: وقد دلت النصوص على أن من القضاء ما هو مبرم لا يغير، ومنه ما هو معلق بالاسباب.

 

 

 

Is Dropshipping Permissible?

                                                                       21st November 2025

Question: I want to set up a dropshipping business; however, I have been informed that Islamicaly it is not permissible. Please clarify if in the Shari’ah, it is permissible or not?

 

 الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

Regarding your query, the current dropshipping method does not comply with Shari’ah principles and therefore, not permissible. The reasons are outlined below, but first, here’s how the process works. Dropshipping is an online retail model in which a seller offers products to customers without owning any inventory. The dropshipper creates an online retail store, markets products on his website and decides the prices. His account is connected to one or more suppliers who handle storage and stock management. When a customer places an order and pays in full on the website, the supplier receives the order, packages the product and ships it directly to the customer. Both the package details and invoice display the seller’s information, not that of the supplier. The dropshipper serves as the primary contact for customers, collects payments, remits a portion to the supplier and retains the remainder as profit. Dropshipping has become a growing market for convenience as it eliminates many retail challenges such as buying, storing and shipping inventory. All what the dropshipper does is to manage customer enquiries, customer satisfaction and ensuring the smooth running of the sale.[1]

We learn that the dropshipper acts as an independent retailer who decides the price and sells products without actually owning them. In the Shari’ah, selling a commodity without owning it is not permissible. Sayyiduna Abdullah Ibn Abbas radhiyallahu anhu reports that the Messenger of Allāh sallallahu alayhi wasallam said, “Whoever purchases food then he must not sell it until he owns it.”[2] Sayyiduna Hakim ibn Hizam radhiyallahu anhu reports that he once asked, ‘O Messenger of Allāh! A man comes to me wanting to buy that is not with me. Shall I purchase it for him from the market?” He said, “Do not sell what is not with you.”[3]

The first hadith uses the term qabdh, meaning complete control of the item and unrestricted transaction as an independent party. The modes of possession vary from culture to culture and in our context, it implies the product is under your name and have full control of its transaction when owned.[4] This is not achieved during the sale because the stock is not in his possession, and therefore the sale won’t be valid. The reasons for its prohibition are many, but two are relevant.  The first is gharar which refers to the risk of uncertain involved when selling an item without ownership. The second rationale pertains to deriving profit from an item without assuming liability (ribh ma lam yadhman) should the item be lost or destroyed.[5] If an item is damaged or destroyed, the legal responsibility falls on the supplier who owns the inventory, not the dropshipper. The dropshipper simply acts as the seller of record and handles customer inquiries and sales transactions. Engaging in such transaction results in a void transaction (bayi’ fasid).[6]  The above impermissibility can be rectified by following one of the below models.

The first option is the dropshipper should avoid completing the transaction before owning the item. Instead, he agrees to sell a product to a potential customer without receiving full payment upfront (or just take a small deposit to secure the agreement). Once the dropshipper acquires the commodity, then they can finalize the sale by collecting the remaining payment and then dispatching the item to the customer.[7] The second option is the dropshipper to act as an agent on behalf of the company/supplier,[8] by signing a formal contract with them to act as their representative and so he is contracting the sale on their behalf. Alternatively, the amount he collects from the customer becomes a security deposit and once he receives the product from the suppliers, he then contracts the sale on their behalf. A third approach involves serving as a broker for the supplier, earning a commission by facilitating transactions between the supplier and the customer. The dropshipper receives a fixed percentage from each sale generated through his marketing efforts, thereby driving increased buyer interest in the supplier’s products.[9]

Another proposed model is deferred-sale (bayi’ salam) where the price is collected upfront and the product delivery is deferred to a later date.[10] The Shari’ah permits this model with strict conditions such as the upfront payment and not deferred, the quantity and quality of the product is known, the  delivery date of the commodity is known, the commodity must be owned and available and both the price and commodity is agreed upon by both parties.[11] In short, everything about the price and commodity must be fixed at the time of the sale. Even in this model, the dropshipper is required to own the item prior to making a sale.

In conclusion, the primary reason for the prohibition of dropshipping is that the dropshipper does not have ownership nor bears any liability of the commodity at the time of sale. However, if the alternative models previously discussed are implemented, then the transactions will be permissible.

 

[Allãh Knows Best]

 

 

Written and researched by (Mufti) Abdul Waheed

Answer Attested by Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

 

[1] For details, see; https://www.shopify.com/blog/what-is-dropshipping?term=&adid=732988891599&campaignid=17075828612&utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=google&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=17075828612&gbraid=0AAAAAC3Mv88vTrO0JRoHQ5M7AnGARFB2_&gclid=Cj0KCQiAq7HIBhDoARIsAOATDxCP9DhEtsXLvPNFZAUkWjlER9nXsXLS2UgFOSkDxf1M1HiJ4EqXJ2gaAoVcEALw_wcB (Accessed November 2025)

See video that explains the process, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URZ8VlgBrwE (Accessed November 2025)

[2] Sahih Muslim, No: 30

8 – بَابُ بُطْلَانِ بَيْعِ الْمَبِيعِ قَبْلَ الْقَبْضِ

عَنْ طَاوُسٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ: «مَنِ ابْتَاعَ طَعَامًا فَلَا يَبِعْهُ حَتَّى يَسْتَوْفِيَهُ»، قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ: وَأَحْسِبُ كُلَّ شَيْءٍ مِثْلَهُ،

عَنِ ابْنِ طَاوُسٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: «مَنِ ابْتَاعَ طَعَامًا فَلَا يَبِعْهُ حَتَّى يَقْبِضَهُ»، قَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ: «وَأَحْسِبُ كُلَّ شَيْءٍ بِمَنْزِلَةِ الطَّعَامِ»

[3] Sunan Abu Dawood, No: 3503

بَابٌ فِي الرَّجُلِ يَبِيعُ مَا لَيْسَ عِنْدَهُ

عَنْ حَكِيمِ بْنِ حِزَامٍ، قَالَ: يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ، يَأْتِينِي الرَّجُلُ فَيُرِيدُ مِنِّي الْبَيْعَ لَيْسَ عِنْدِي أَفَأَبْتَاعُهُ لَهُ مِنَ السُّوقِ؟ فَقَالَ: «لَا تَبِعْ مَا لَيْسَ عِنْدَكَ»

[4] Kasān, Badā’i Sanāi, Kitāb al-Buyu’, vol 5 p. 147-148

[فَصْلٌ فِي الشَّرْط الَّذِي يَرْجِعُ إلَى الْمَعْقُودِ عَلَيْهِ]

(وَمِنْهَا) وَهُوَ شَرْطُ انْعِقَادِ الْبَيْعِ لِلْبَائِعِ أَنْ يَكُونَ مَمْلُوكًا لِلْبَائِعِ عِنْدَ الْبَيْعِ فَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ لَا يَنْعَقِدْ، وَإِنْ مَلَكَهُ بَعْدَ ذَلِكَ بِوَجْهٍ مِنْ الْوُجُوهِ إلَّا السَّلَمَ خَاصَّةً، وَهَذَا بَيْعُ مَا لَيْسَ عِنْدَهُ «، وَنَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ – صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ – عَنْ بَيْعِ مَا لَيْسَ عِنْدَ الْإِنْسَانِ، وَرَخَّصَ فِي السَّلَمِ» وَلَوْ بَاعَ الْمَغْصُوبَ فَضَمَّنَهُ الْمَالِكُ قِيمَتَهُ نَفَذَ بَيْعُهُ؛ لِأَنَّ سَبَبَ الْمِلْكِ قَدْ تَقَدَّمَ فَتَبَيَّنَ أَنَّهُ بَاعَ مِلْكَ نَفْسِهِ، وَهَهُنَا تَأَخَّرَ سَبَبُ الْمِلْكِ فَيَكُونُ بَائِعًا مَا لَيْسَ عِنْدَهُ فَدَخَلَ تَحْتَ النَّهْيِ، وَالْمُرَادُ مِنْهُ بَيْعُ مَا لَيْسَ عِنْدَهُ مِلْكًا؛ لِأَنَّ قِصَّةَ الْحَدِيثِ تَدُلُّ عَلَيْهِ فَإِنَّهُ رُوِيَ أَنَّ «حَكِيمَ بْنَ حِزَامٍ كَانَ يَبِيعُ النَّاسَ أَشْيَاءَ لَا يَمْلِكُهَا، وَيَأْخُذُ الثَّمَنَ مِنْهُمْ ثُمَّ يَدْخُلُ السُّوقَ فَيَشْتَرِي، وَيُسَلِّمَ إلَيْهِمْ فَبَلَغَ ذَلِكَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ – صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ – فَقَالَ لَا تَبِعْ مَا لَيْسَ عِنْدَكَ» ، وَلِأَنَّ بَيْعَ مَا لَيْسَ عِنْدَهُ بِطَرِيقِ الْأَصَالَةِ عَنْ نَفْسِهِ تَمْلِيكُ مَا لَا يَمْلِكُهُ بِطَرِيقِ الْأَصَالَةِ، وَأَنَّهُ مُحَالٌ وَهُوَ الشَّرْطُ فِيمَا يَبِيعُهُ بِطَرِيقِ الْأَصَالَةِ عَنْ نَفْسِهِ فَأَمَّا مَا يَبِيعُهُ بِطَرِيقِ النِّيَابَةِ عَنْ غَيْرِهِ يُنْظَرُ إنْ كَانَ الْبَائِعُ وَكِيلًا وَكَفِيلًا فَيَكُونُ الْمَبِيعُ مَمْلُوكًا لِلْبَائِعِ لَيْسَ بِشَرْطٍ، وَإِنْ كَانَ فُضُولِيًّا فَلَيْسَ بِشَرْطٍ لِلِانْعِقَادِ عِنْدَنَا بَلْ هُوَ مِنْ شَرَائِطِ النَّفَاذ فَإِنَّ بَيْعَ الْفُضُولِيِّ عِنْدَنَا مُنْعَقِدٌ مَوْقُوفٌ عَلَى إجَازَةِ الْمَالِكِ، فَإِنْ أَجَازَ نَفَذَ، وَإِنْ رَدَّ بَطَلَ،…….

وَلَا يُشْتَرَطُ الْقَبْضُ بِالْبَرَاجِمِ؛ لِأَنَّ مَعْنَى الْقَبْضِ هُوَ التَّمْكِينُ، وَالتَّخَلِّي، وَارْتِفَاعُ الْمَوَانِعِ عُرْفًا وَعَادَةً حَقِيقَةً

 

Kasān, Badā’i Sanāi, Kitāb al-Hiba, vol 6 p. 120

فَصْلٌ فِي شَرَائِط رُكْن الْهِبَة

وَلِأَنَّ الْقَبْضَ شَرْطُ جَوَازِ هَذَا الْعَقْدِ وَالشُّيُوعُ يَمْنَعُ مِنْ الْقَبْضِ لِأَنَّ مَعْنَى الْقَبْضِ هُوَ التَّمَكُّنُ مِنْ التَّصَرُّفِ فِي الْمَقْبُوضِ

See Shaykh Khalid Saifullah Rahmani, Jadeed Fiqhi Maqalat, vol 4, p. 195-200

[5] Shaykh Mufti Ridhaul Haq, Fatawa Darul-Ulum Zakaiyyah, vol 5, p. 114

[6] Shaykh Mufti Ridhaul Haq, Fatawa Darul-Ulum Zakaiyyah, vol 5, p. 115, Shaykh Khalid Saifullah Rahmani, Jadeed Fiqhi Maqalat, vol 4, p. 193

[7] Mufti Rasheed Ahmad Ludhyanqi, Ahsanul Fatawa, vol 6, p. 525,

[8] Kasān, Badā’i Sanāi, Kitāb al-Buyu’, vol 6 p. 20

[فَصْلٌ فِي الشَّرْط الَّذِي يَرْجِعُ إلَى الْمَعْقُودِ عَلَيْهِ]

فَالْوِلَايَةُ فِي الْأَصْلِ نَوْعَانِ: نَوْعٌ يَثْبُتُ بِتَوْلِيَةِ الْمَالِكِ، وَنَوْعٌ يَثْبُتُ شَرْعًا لَا بِتَوْلِيَةِ الْمَالِكِ، أَمَّا الْأَوَّلُ فَهُوَ وِلَايَةُ الْوَكِيلِ فَيَنْفُذُ تَصَرُّفُ الْوَكِيلِ، وَإِنْ لَمْ يَكُنْ الْمَحَلُّ مَمْلُوكًا لَهُ لِوُجُودِ الْوِلَايَةِ الْمُسْتَفَادَةِ مِنْ الْمُوَكِّلِ.

Kasān, Badā’i Sanāi, Kitāb al-Buyu’, vol 5 p. 152

[فَصْلٌ فِي بَيَانُ رُكْنِ التَّوْكِيلِ]

(فَصْلٌ) :وَأَمَّا بَيَانُ رُكْنِ التَّوْكِيلِ. فَهُوَ الْإِيجَابُ وَالْقَبُولُ فَالْإِيجَابُ مِنْ الْمُوَكِّلِ أَنْ يَقُولَ: ” وَكَّلْتُكَ بِكَذَا ” أَوْ ” افْعَلْ كَذَا ” أَوْ ” أَذِنْتُ لَكَ أَنْ تَفْعَلَ كَذَا ” وَنَحْوُهُ.وَالْقَبُولُ مِنْ الْوَكِيلِ أَنْ يَقُولَ: ” قَبِلْتُ ” وَمَا يَجْرِي مَجْرَاهُ، فَمَا لَمْ يُوجَدْ الْإِيجَابُ وَالْقَبُولُ لَا يَتِمُّ الْعَقْدُ؛ وَلِهَذَا لَوْ وَكَّلَ إنْسَانًا بِقَبْضِ دَيْنِهِ فَأَبَى أَنْ يَقْبَلَ، ثُمَّ ذَهَبَ الْوَكِيلُ فَقَبَضَهُ لَمْ يَبْرَأْ الْغَرِيمُ؛ لِأَنَّ تَمَامَ الْعَقْدِ بِالْإِيجَابِ وَالْقَبُولِ، وَكُلُّ وَاحِدٍ مِنْهُمَا يَرْتَدُّ بِالرَّدِّ قَبْلَ وُجُودِ الْآخَرِ، كَمَا فِي الْبَيْعِ وَنَحْوِهِ.

[9] Ibn Nujaym, Bahr Rāiq, Kitāb al-Buyu’, vol 7 p. 270

(فَلَوْ بَاعَ الْمَتَاعَ مُرَابَحَةً حُسِبَ مَا أَنْفَقَ عَلَى الْمَتَاعِ) مِنْ الْحُمْلَانِ وَأُجْرَةِ السِّمْسَارِ وَالْقَصَّارِ وَالصَّبَّاغِ وَنَحْوِهِ وَيَقُولُ قَامَ عَلَيَّ بِكَذَا وَالْأَصْلُ أَنَّ مَا يُوجِبُ زِيَادَةً فِي رَأْسِ الْمَالِ حَقِيقَةً أَوْ حُكْمًا يَضُمُّهُ إلَى رَأْسِ الْمَالِ وَكَذَا مَا اعْتَادَهُ التُّجَّارُ كَأُجْرَةِ السِّمْسَارِ كَذَا فِي النِّهَايَةِ.

Durrul Mukhtār, Kitāb al-Buyu’, vol 5 p. 102

كُرِهَ (بَيْعُ الْحَاضِرِ لِلْبَادِي) وَهَذَا (فِي حَالَةِ قَحْطٍ وَعَوَزٍ وَإِلَّا لَا) لِانْعِدَامِ الضَّرَرِ، قِيلَ الْحَاضِرُ الْمَالِكُ وَالْبَادِي الْمُشْتَرِي وَالْأَصَحُّ كَمَا فِي الْمُجْتَبَى أَنَّهُمَا السِّمْسَارُ وَالْبَائِعُ لِمُوَافَقَتِهِ آخِرَ الْحَدِيثِ «دَعُوا النَّاسَ يَرْزُقُ بَعْضُهُمْ بَعْضًا»

Durrul Mukhtār wa hashiyah Ibn Ābideen Shāmi Kitāb al-Buyu’, vol 5 p. 136

(وَأُجْرَةَ السِّمْسَارِ) هُوَ الدَّالُّ عَلَى مَكَانِ السِّلْعَةِ وَصَاحِبِهَا (الْمَشْرُوطَةَ فِي الْعَقْدِ) عَلَى مَا جَزَمَ بِهِ فِي الدُّرَرِ وَرَجَّحَ فِي الْبَحْرِ الْإِطْلَاقَ وَضَابِطُهُ كُلُّ مَا يَزِيدُ فِي الْمَبِيعِ أَوْ فِي قِيمَتِهِ يُضَمُّ

(قَوْلُهُ: هُوَ الدَّالُّ عَلَى مَكَانِ السِّلْعَةِ وَصَاحِبِهَا) لَا فَرْقَ لُغَةً بَيْنَ السِّمْسَارِ وَالدَّلَّالِ، وَقَدْ فَسَّرَهُمَا فِي الْقَامُوسِ بِالْمُتَوَسِّطِ بَيْنَ الْبَائِعِ وَالْمُشْتَرِي، وَفَرَّقَ بَيْنَهُمَا الْفُقَهَاءُ، فَالسِّمْسَارُ هُوَ مَا ذَكَرَهُ الْمُؤَلِّفُ، وَالدَّلَّالُ هُوَ الْمُصَاحِبُ لِلسِّلْعَةِ غَالِبًا……

(قَوْلُهُ: وَرَجَّحَ فِي الْبَحْرِ الْإِطْلَاقَ) حَيْثُ قَالَ: وَأَمَّا أُجْرَةُ السِّمْسَارِ وَالدَّلَّالِ فَقَالَ الشَّارِحُ الزَّيْلَعِيُّ: إنْ كَانَتْ مَشْرُوطَةً فِي الْعَقْدِ تُضَمُّ، وَإِلَّا فَأَكْثَرُهُمْ عَلَى عَدَمِ الضَّمِّ فِي الْأَوَّلِ، وَلَا تُضَمُّ أُجْرَةُ الدَّلَّالِ بِالْإِجْمَاعِ

Durrul Mukhtār wa hashiyah Ibn Ābideen Shāmi Kitāb al-Buyu’, vol 6 p. 63

[مَطْلَبٌ فِي اسْتِئْجَارِ الْمَاءِ مَعَ الْقَنَاةِ وَاسْتِئْجَارِ الْآجَامِ وَالْحِيَاضِ لِلسَّمَكِ]

مَطْلَبٌ فِي أُجْرَةِ الدَّلَّالِ [تَتِمَّةٌ]

قَالَ فِي التتارخانية: وَفِي الدَّلَّالِ وَالسِّمْسَارِ يَجِبُ أَجْرُ الْمِثْلِ، وَمَا تَوَاضَعُوا عَلَيْهِ أَنَّ فِي كُلِّ عَشَرَةِ دَنَانِيرَ كَذَا فَذَاكَ حَرَامٌ عَلَيْهِمْ. وَفِي الْحَاوِي: سُئِلَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ عَنْ أُجْرَةِ السِّمْسَارِ، فَقَالَ: أَرْجُو أَنَّهُ لَا بَأْسَ بِهِ وَإِنْ كَانَ فِي الْأَصْلِ فَاسِدًا لِكَثْرَةِ التَّعَامُلِ وَكَثِيرٌ مِنْ هَذَا غَيْرُ جَائِزٍ، فَجَوَّزُوهُ لِحَاجَةِ النَّاسِ إلَيْهِ كَدُخُولِ الْحَمَّامِ وَعَنْهُ قَالَ: رَأَيْتُ ابْنَ شُجَاعٍ يُقَاطِعُ نَسَّاجًا يَنْسِجُ لَهُ ثِيَابًا فِي كُلِّ سَنَةٍ.

Shaykh Mufti Ridhaul Haq, Fatawa Darul-Ulum Zakaiyyah, vol 5, p. 113-116,

[10] Fatawa Hindiyyah, Kitāb al-Buyu’, vol 3, p. 178

[الْفَصْلُ الْأَوَّلُ فِي تَفْسِير السَّلَم وَرُكْنِهِ وَشَرَائِطِهِ وَحُكْمِهِ]

أَمَّا تَفْسِيرُهُ فَالسَّلَمُ عَقْدٌ يَثْبُتُ بِهِ الْمِلْكُ فِي الثَّمَنِ عَاجِلًا وَفِي الْمُثَمَّنِ آجِلًا.

[11] Shaykh Khalid Saifullah Rahmani, Qamoosul Fiqh, Salam, vol 4, pp. 171-176

 Using Interest Money to Pay for Parking Tickets

18th November 2025

 السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question:  I would like to know if it is permissible to use interest money to pay a fine, such as a parking fine?

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer:

Thank you for your question. In reference to your query, it is generally not permissible to take personal benefit from interest money. Any interest money acquired must be returned to its original owner. If this is not possible, then it must be distributed to the neediest without the intention of reward, [1] or utilized for public welfare projects such as building roads (or medical health research).[2] The money cannot be used to pay for a fine such as a parking fine.

[Allāh Knows Best]

Written by:  Mufti Anas Mullah        Reviewed by: Mufti Abdul Waheed

Attested by: Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

[1] Ibn Abideen ash-Shami, Radd ul Muhtaar, Book of Permissibility, Chapter of Transactions, vol 6, p 385

– – (قوله كما بسطه الزيلعي) حيث قال لأنه كالمغصوب وقال في النهاية: قال بعض مشايخنا: كسب المغنية كالمغصوب لم يحل أخذه، وعلى هذا قالوا لو مات الرجل وكسبه من بيع الباذق أو الظلم أو أخذ الرشوة يتورع الورثة، ولا يأخذون منه شيئا وهو أولى بهم ويردونها على أربابها إن عرفوهم، وإلا تصدقوا بها لأن سبيل الكسب الخبيث التصدق إذا تعذر الرد على صاحبه اهـ لكن في الهندية عن المنتقى عن محمد في كسب النائحة، وصاحب طبل أو مزمار، لو أخذ بلا شرط، ودفعه المالك برضاه فهو حلال ومثله في المواهب وفي التتارخانية وما جمع السائل من المال فهو خبيث

Ibn Nujaym, Al Bahr al Raaiq, Kitaab al Permissibility,Chapter of Transactions, vol 8, p229

وإلا يتصدقوا به؛ لأن سبيل الكسب الخبيث التصدق إذا تعذر الرد

 Ibn Abideen, raddul Muhtaar,Book of zakat, vol 2, p 292

من ملك أموالا غير طيبة أو غصب أموالا و خلطها ملكها بالخلط و يصير ضامنا (الي قوله) ان علمت اصحابه او ورثتهم وجب رده عليهم و الا وجب التصدق

[2] Shaykh Khalid Saifullah Rahmani, Kitabul Fatawa, vol 5, p. 333, Ruling on the Recipients of Interest.

Menstruating Woman Reciting Her Nightly Duas & Wazaif

21st October 2025

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

 Question: If I’m on my periods, can I as part of my night routine, allowed to recite the following;

  • Quranic ayats – ayat ul qursi, 4 quls, surah duha, other duas from Quran etc
  • Durood
  • Other general duas not from the Quran
  • Does it make a difference if you touch these or read off memory

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer

In reference to the above query, it is prohibited for a menstruating woman to recite verses from the Quran or touch the mushaf[1]. However, if she is reciting dua’s or verses for dua i.e. Ayatul Kursi she is allowed to do so, given that she is intending to read under the purpose of dua and not as recitation of the Quran. [2]She is also allowed to recite durood in the state of menses as there are no restrictions around this. If she is reciting such duas from the Quran, she should refrain touching the mushaf as this is prohibited[3]. There is no harm in reciting these verses for the purpose of dua from memory. [4]

 

Written by: Apa Sumayyah Abdul Alim

 

Reviewed by: Mufti Abdul Waheed

 

Attested by : Shaikh Mufti Saiful Islam

 

JKN Fatwa Department

. [1] Al bahrur Raiq Kitaab Taharah babul Haidh vol 1 pg 204

ه السَّابِعُ: يُحَرِّمُ مَسَّ الْمُصْحَفِ  وَحَمْل

الثَّامِنُ: يُحَرِّمُ قِرَاءَةَ الْقُرْآنِ.

 

 

Fatawa Hindiyyah Kitaab Tahaara  baab dimaa al mukhtassa bin nisaa vol 1 pg 36

وَمِنْهَا) حُرْمَةُ  مَسِّ الْمُصْحَفِ  لَا يَجُوزُ لَهُمَا وَلِلْجُنُبِ وَالْمُحْدِثِ مَس الْمُصْحَفِ إلَّا بِغِلَافٍ مُتَجَافٍ عَنْهُ كَالْخَرِيطَةِ وَالْجِلْدِ الْغَيْرِ الْمُشَرَّزِ لَا بِمَا هُوَ مُتَّصِلٌ بِهِ، هُوَ الصَّحِيحُ. هَكَذَا فِي الْهِدَايَةِ وَعَلَيْهِ الْفَتْوَى. كَذَا فِي الْجَوْهَرَةِ النَّيِّرَةِ.

 

[2] Raddul mukhtar Kitaab Tahaara baabul haidh vol 1 pg 291

ويجوز لهما قراءة الآية بقصد الدعاء والثناء لا بقصد التلاوة

 

Al bahrur Raaiq Kitaab Tahaara  baabul Haidh vol 1 pg 203

ويجوز للجنب والحائض قراءة بعض الآيات إذا كان بقصد الدعاء أو الثناء كآية الكرسي وسورة الإخلاص

 

[3] Raddul Mukhtar Kitaab Tahaara Baabul Haidh vol 1 pg 290

فلا يجوز للجنب ولا للحائض مسه

 

[4] Fatawa Hindiyyah KItaab Tahaara Baabul Dimaa al Mukhtassa bin nisaa vol 1 pg 36

ويجوز للحائض أن تنظر في المصحف وتقرأه في قلبها من غير تحريك لسانها

 

Ruling on Marriage between a Fornicator’s Illegitimate Son and Legitimate Daughter

14th October 2025

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Question: If a married man committed zina with another woman and had an illegitimate child from her then is this male child a mahram to his daughter born from wedlock?

الجواب حامداً و مصلياً

In the name of Allāh, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Answer: In reference to your query, according to the Sharīʿah, lineage (nasab) is established only through a valid nikāh (marriage). A child born through zinā (fornication) has no legitimate lineage and so, he will not be legally attributed to the biological father but to the mother instead.[1] He won’t inherit from his biological father either.[2] Despite this, marriage between this illegitimate child and his daughter born in wedlock is not permitted due to the closeness of the biological relationship and moreover.[3]

The rules of ḥijāb must be maintained despite this and khalwa (seclusion) is not permissible between them. Interaction should follow the general rulings related to non-mahrams.

[Allāh Knows Best]

Written by:  Apa Sumayya Qazi         Reviewed by: Mufti Abdul Waheed

Attested by: Shaykh Mufti Saiful Islam

JKN Fatawa Department

[1] Radul Muhtar, Kitāb al-Nikāh, Vol 3, pg, 360

ولدا الزنا لا يلحق بازاني وان أقرّ

 

[2] Fatawa Hindiyyāh, Kitāb al-Nikāh, Vol 3 pg, 352

لا ينسبونه الزنا إلى الزاني، ولا يرث أحدهما من الآخر

 

[3] Raddul Mukhtar, Kitāb al-Nikāh, Vol 3, Pg 29

(وَبِنْتِ أَخِيهِ وَأُخْتِهِ وَبِنْتِهَا) وَلَوْ مِنْ زِنًى (وَعَمَّتِهِ وَخَالَتُهُ) فَهَذِهِ السَّبْعَةُ

فِي كِتَابِ الرَّضَاعِ مِنْ أَنَّ الْبِنْتَ مِنْ الزِّنَى لَا تَحْرُمُ عَلَى عَمِّ الزَّانِي وَخَالِهِ لِأَنَّهُ لَمْ يَثْبُتْ نَسَبُهَا مِنْ الزَّانِي حَتَّى يَظْهَرَ فِيهَا حُكْمُ الرِّقَابَةِ، وَأَمَّا التَّحْرِيمُ عَلَى آبَاءِ الزَّانِي وَأَوْلَادِهِ فَلِاعْتِبَارِ الْجُزْئِيَّةِ وَلَا جُزْئِيَّةَ بَيْنَهَا وَبَيْنَ الْعَمِّ وَالْخَالِ.

 

Raddul Mukhtar, Kitāb al-Nikāh, Vol 3, Pg 31

وَأَمَّا بِنْتُ زَوْجَةِ أَبِيهِ أَوْ ابْنُهُ فَحَلَالٌ (وَ) حَرُمَ (الْكُلُّ) مِمَّا مَرَّ تَحْرِيمُهُ نَسَبًا، وَمُصَاهَرَةً (رَضَاعًا) إلَّا مَا اُسْتُثْنِيَ فِي بَابِهِ. .

وَمُقْتَضَى تَقْيِيدِهِ بِالْفَرْعِ وَالْأَصْلِ أَنَّهُ لَا خِلَافَ فِي عَدَمِ الْحُرْمَةِ عَلَى غَيْرِهِمَا مِنْ الْحَوَاشِي كَالْأَخِ وَالْعَمِّ. وَفِي التَّنْجِيسِ زَنَى بِامْرَأَةٍ فَوَلَدَتْ فَأَرْضَعَتْ بِهَذَا اللَّبَنِ صَبِيَّةً لَا يَجُوزُ لِهَذَا الزَّانِي تَزَوُّجُهَا وَلَا لِأُصُولِهِ وَفُرُوعِهِ، وَالْعَمِّ الزَّانِي التَّزَوُّجُ بِهَا كَمَا لَوْ كَانَتْ وَلَدَتْ لَهُ مِنْ الزِّنَى، وَالْخَالُ مِثْلُهُ؛ لِأَنَّهُ لَمْ يَثْبُتْ نَسَبُهَا مِنْ الزَّانِي، حَتَّى يَظْهَرَ فِيهَا حُكْمُ الْقَرَابَةِ وَالتَّحْرِيمُ عَلَى أَبِي الزَّانِي وَأَوْلَادِهِ وَأَوْلَادِهِمْ لِاعْتِبَارِ الْجُزْئِيَّةِ وَلَا جُزْئِيَّةَ بَيْنَهَا وَبَيْنَ الْعَمِّ، وَإِذَا ثَبَتَ ذَلِكَ فِي الْمُتَوَلِّدَةِ مِنْ الزِّنَى كَذَا فِي الْمُرْضَعَةِ بِلَبَنِ الزِّنَى. اهـ. قُلْت: وَهَذَا مُخَالِفٌ لِمَا مَرَّ مِنْ التَّعْمِيمِ فِي قَوْلِ الشَّارِحِ: وَلَوْ مِنْ زِنًى كَمَا نَبَّهْنَا عَلَيْهِ هُنَاكَ.